Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 7;29:e940783-1–e940783-10. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940783

Table 6.

The main characteristics of different grading systems.

Grading System Sensitivity(%) Specificity(%) PPV PLR DOR
SAP
Ascites volume ≥344 ml 93 (84, 98) 79 (59, 92) 90 (80, 96) 4.4 (2.1, 8.9) 51.3 (13.2, 199.6)
BISAP ≥2 87 (75, 94) 57 (37, 76) 81 (70, 90) 2.0 (1.3, 3.1) 8.7 (3.0, 24.9)
APACHE II
 ≥8 57 (43, 69) 71 (51, 87) 81 (66, 91) 2.0 (1.1, 3.7) 3.3 (1.2, 8.6)
 ≥10 42 (29, 55) 93 (77, 99) 93 (76, 99) 5.8 (1.5, 22.9) 9.3 (2.0, 42.8)
CRP level
 ≥150 mg/L 48 (35, 62) 86 (67, 96) 88 (72, 97) 3.4 (1.3, 8.7) 5.6 (1.7, 18.1)
 ≥115 mg/L 63 (50, 75) 79 (59, 92) 86 (73, 95) 3.0 () 6.3 (2.2, 18.0)
PCT level
 ≥0.43ng/L 77 (64, 87) 68 (48, 84) 84 (71, 92) 2.4 (1.4, 4.2) 6.9 (2.6, 18.7)

The confidence interval in brackets is 95%. PPV – positive predictive value; PLR – positive likelihood ratio; DOR – diagnostic advantage ratio.