Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 7;11(15):2220. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152220

Table 2.

The quality of included cross-sectional studies as per the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

Author (YOP) Selection Comparability Outcomes Overall Rating
Ferraro (2020) [11] 4 2 2 Good
Rajan (2018) [36] 3 2 2 Good
Alqahtani (2019) [8] 4 2 2 Good
Takayesu (2014) [5] 3 0 2 Poor
Mourkazel (2019) [32] 3 2 2 Good
Soltanifar (2018) [39] 2 2 2 Fair
Lin (2019) [12] 3 2 2 Good
Hamdan (2017) [26] 3 2 2 Good
Williams (2020) [40] 3 0 2 Poor
Durand (2019) [10] 2 2 2 Fair
Schooley (2016) [37] 3 2 2 Good
Lu (2015) [31] 2 2 2 Fair
Dam (2019) [23] 3 2 2 Good
Hutchison (2014) [27] 3 2 2 Good
Jalili (2013) [28] 4 0 2 Poor
Lloyd (1994) [30] 3 2 2 Good
Kuhn (2009) [29] 3 2 2 Good
Patterson (2020) [33] 4 2 2 Good
Popa (2010) [35] 2 0 2 Poor
Erdur (2015) [24] 4 2 2 Good
Bergemueler (2016) [20] 3 0 2 Poor
Escribà-Agüir (2007) [25] 2 0 2 Poor
Petrino (2022) [34] 4 2 2 Good
Mercuri (2022) [13] 3 0 2 Poor
Chang (2021) [9] 4 2 2 Good
Bhanja (2021) [21] 2 2 2 Fair
Shopen (2022) [38] 3 2 2 Good
Chor (2021) [22] 2 2 2 Fair
Ben-Itzhak (2015) [19] 3 2 2 Good

YOP: year of publication. The selection domain was given an overall score of 4, and the comparability and outcomes domains were given overall scores of 2 and 3, respectively.