Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1990 Mar;74(3):183–185. doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.3.183

Ultrasonographic measurement of uveal melanoma thickness: interobserver variability.

D H Char 1, S Kroll 1, R D Stone 1, R Harrie 1, B Kerman 1
PMCID: PMC1042045  PMID: 2182105

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed ultrasonographic data on 32 uveal melanomas that had been studied both at a referral institution and at our centre within a six-week period. Generally there were good correlations between ultrasonographic measurements of tumour thickness. The mean absolute difference in ultrasound measurements of tumour thickness was 0.64 mm (range 0-2.2 mm); the mean tumour thickness was 5.2 mm (range 3.5-10.2 mm). Tumour diameter, location, the relative ultrasonographic experience with uveal melanoma, type of equipment, and tumour thickness all affected the interobserver variation of measurement.

Full text

PDF
185

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Char D. H., Stone R. D., Irvine A. R., Crawford J. B., Hilton G. F., Lonn L. I., Schwartz A. Diagnostic modalities in choroidal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Feb;89(2):223–230. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(80)90115-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coleman D. J. Echographic and histologic tumor height measurements in uveal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan 15;101(1):124–126. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90483-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kindy-Degnan N. A., Char D. H., Castro J. R., Kroll S., Stone R. D., Quivey J. M., Phillips T. L., Irvine A. R. Effect of various doses of radiation for uveal melanoma on regression, visual acuity, complications, and survival. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb 15;107(2):114–120. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90208-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nicholson D. H., Frazier-Byrne S., Chiu M. T., Schiffman J., Hughes J. R., Novinski E. K. Echographic and histologic tumor height measurements in uveal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Sep 15;100(3):454–457. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(85)90513-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ossoinig K. C., Bigar F., Kaefring S. L. Malignant melanoma of the choroid and ciliary body. A differential diagnosis in clinical echography. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1975;(83):141–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peyster R. G., Augsburger J. J., Shields J. A., Satchell T. V., Markoe A. M., Clarke K., Haskin M. E. Choroidal melanoma: comparison of CT, fundoscopy, and US. Radiology. 1985 Sep;156(3):675–680. doi: 10.1148/radiology.156.3.3895292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Seddon J. M., Gragoudas E. S., Polivogianis L., Hsieh C. C., Egan K. M., Goitein M., Verhey L., Munzenrider J., Austin-Seymour M., Urie M. Visual outcome after proton beam irradiation of uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 1986 May;93(5):666–674. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33700-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES