Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 4;31(8):2422–2438. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.06.019

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immune response following in vivo editing with viral and non-viral Cas9 delivery strategies

(A) Representative immunostaining of Iba1 (microglia, green) with tdTomato and DAPI using confocal microscopy. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Quantification of Iba1+ staining intensity and percent area (n = 4–6 technical replicates, one-way ANOVA, ∗p < 0.05). (C) Quantification of CD45+ and CD3+ cells per image (n = 3–6 replicates, one-way ANOVA, ns). (D) Representative images of CD45, CD3, and Iba1 showing co-expression of CD45 (green) with both Iba1 (microglia, red) and CD3 (T cells, red) cells and differential cell morphology. Merged images include DAPI (gray) and tdTomato (magenta). Scale bars, 50 μm. (E) Quantification of IgG antibodies against Cas9 or AAV capsid proteins measured 28 and 90 days after bilateral intrastriatal injections by ELISA (n = 3–5 biological replicates). (F) Heatmap summarizing qRT-PCR results of gene expression from homogenized brain tissue near the injection site (striatum and cortex) at two time points. Ppih was used as a housekeeping control for delta-delta Ct analysis and compared with the sham group using the QIAGEN analysis portal (n = 4, ∗p < 0.05).