Maroske 1981.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Country: Germany Number randomised: 24 Post‐randomisation exclusions: not stated Revised sample size: 24 Mean age: not stated Females: not stated Mean duration of follow‐up: not stated Inclusion criteria People with acute haemorrhagic (necrotising) pancreatitis |
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups Group 1: open necrosectomy (n = 12) Pancreatic resection was performed as necessary Group 2: peritoneal lavage (n = 12) Not clear whether the peritoneal lavage was performed percutaneously or by open surgery |
|
Outcomes | Mortality | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: complications were not reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Comment: source of funding was not available. There was no other bias |