Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 16;2016(4):CD011383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011383.pub2

Maroske 1981.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants Country: Germany
Number randomised: 24
Post‐randomisation exclusions: not stated
Revised sample size: 24
Mean age: not stated
Females: not stated
Mean duration of follow‐up: not stated
Inclusion criteria
People with acute haemorrhagic (necrotising) pancreatitis
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups
Group 1: open necrosectomy (n = 12)
Pancreatic resection was performed as necessary
Group 2: peritoneal lavage (n = 12)
Not clear whether the peritoneal lavage was performed percutaneously or by open surgery
Outcomes Mortality
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: complications were not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: source of funding was not available. There was no other bias