Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2022 Nov 30;7:100280. doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100280

Table 2.

Corrected concentrations for all runs and both replicates of 10 g crumb rubber and 5 g turf fiber samples. Numerical values reported for sample concentrations detected above the lower limits of quantification (>0.25 and > 0.27 ng/μL for 6:2 and 8:2 FTOH, respectively). <LLOD: sample concentrations were below the lower limits of detection (<0.36 and < 0.083 ng/μL for 4:2 and 6:2 FTOH, respectively).

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Corrected Concentration (ng/μL)
Crumb Rubber (Replicate 1)
 4:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 6:2 FTOH 0.49 < LLOD < LLOD
 8:2 FTOH 0.87 0.77 0.77
Crumb Rubber (Replicate 2)
 4:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 6:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 8:2 FTOH 0.70 0.57 0.57
Turf Fibers (Replicate 1)
 4:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 6:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 8:2 FTOH 1.10 1.10 0.93
Turf Fibers (Replicate 2)
 4:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 6:2 FTOH < LLOD < LLOD < LLOD
 8:2 FTOH 0.85 0.90 1.10