Table 3.
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the associations between dietary diversity score and nutritional status
| Bivariate | P-value | Multivariate | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight for age (<−2 sd) | |||||
| Dietary diversity score | n | OR (95 % CI) | AOR (95 % CI) | ||
| 36 | 0⋅34 (0⋅15, 1⋅76) | 0⋅44 | 0⋅31 (0⋅13, 0⋅7) | 0⋅02 | |
| 3 | 119 | 0⋅91 (0⋅5, 1⋅54) | 0⋅28 | 0⋅49 (0⋅26, 0⋅81) | 0⋅01 |
| 4 | 39 | 0⋅76 (0⋅14, 3⋅81) | 0⋅74 | 0⋅99 (0⋅94, 1⋅05) | 0⋅62 |
| 5 | 57 | 0⋅46 (0⋅08, 2⋅23) | 0⋅33 | 0⋅33 (0⋅09, 1⋅19) | 0⋅26 |
| 6 | 22 | 1⋅32 (0⋅23, 6⋅86) | 0⋅73 | 0⋅23 (0⋅52, 1⋅62) | 0⋅76 |
| Minimum dietary diversity < 4 (Food groups) | 0⋅53 (0⋅29, 0⋅18) | 0⋅38 | 0⋅25 (0⋅08, 0⋅75) | 0⋅03 | |
| Height for age (<−2 sd) | |||||
| Dietary diversity score | n | ||||
| 2 | 36 | 0⋅35 (0⋅15, 0⋅32) | 0⋅02 | 0⋅22 (0⋅13, 0⋅76) | 0⋅01 |
| 3 | 119 | 0⋅34 (0⋅33, 1⋅78) | 0⋅45 | 0⋅29 (0⋅01, 0⋅84) | 0⋅04 |
| 4 | 39 | 1⋅07 (0⋅31, 3⋅61) | 0⋅91 | 0⋅22 (0⋅31, 0⋅64) | 0⋅05 |
| 5 | 57 | 1⋅49 (0⋅53, 4⋅40) | 0⋅46 | 0⋅57 (0⋅31, 1⋅05) | 0⋅11 |
| 6 | 22 | 2⋅97 (0⋅85, 10⋅68) | 0⋅09 | 0⋅16 (0⋅19, 1⋅38) | 0⋅49 |
| Minimum dietary diversity < 4 (Food groups) | 0⋅69 (0⋅35, 1⋅38) | 0⋅53 | 0⋅32 (0⋅14, 0⋅74) | 0⋅01 | |
| Weight for height (<−2 sd) | |||||
| Dietary diversity score | n | ||||
| 2 | 36 | 0. 54 (0⋅23, 1⋅32) | 0⋅15 | 0⋅22 (0⋅16, 1⋅16) | 0⋅19 |
| 3 | 119 | 0⋅85 (0⋅67, 1⋅08) | 0⋅21 | 0⋅82 (0⋅64, 1⋅06) | 0⋅13 |
| 4 | 39 | 1⋅19 (0⋅52, 2⋅76) | 0⋅67 | 0⋅72 (0⋅44, 1⋅18) | 0⋅26 |
| 5 | 57 | 0⋅96 (0⋅80, 1⋅21) | 0⋅17 | 0⋅87 (0⋅68, 1⋅14) | 0⋅12 |
| 6 | 22 | 0⋅98 (0⋅43, 2⋅36) | 0⋅97 | 0⋅35 (0⋅64, 1⋅43) | 0⋅34 |
| Minimum dietary diversity < 4 (Food groups) | 0⋅65 (0⋅43, 1⋅19) | 0⋅68 | 0⋅33 (0⋅32, 1⋅13) | 0⋅09 | |
P < 0⋅05; adjusted for age, sex, income, marital status and employment CI confidence interval, OR (odds ratio) and AOR (adjusted odds ratio), the score of ≥4 was used as a reference category.