Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;44(5):1157–1172. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001352

TABLE 4.

Summary of sensitivity and FPR of CAEP tests for different analysis methods

Test Description α FPR Stimulus Sensitivity
Theoretical Measured Overall (≥ 0 dB SL) 0 to 10 dB SL >10 dB SL
Single HT2 test, single stimulus (Fig. 6A) 0.05 5.0% 4.5% MF 69.6% 54.3% 80.3%
0.0% HF 53.7% 42.5% 60.3%
Initial or repeat HT2 tests, single stimulus (Fig. 6B) 0.05 9.8% 9.1% MF 83.9% 69.6% 93.9%
0.0% HF 72.2% 60.0% 79.4%
Initial and repeat HT2 tests, either stimulus (Fig. 6B, black line) 0.05 18.5% 9.1% Either 92.6% 81.3% 97.4%
Initial or repeat HT2 tests, single stimulus (adjusted p value on both tests) 0.025 4.9% 0.0% MF 82.1% 65.2% 93.9%
0.0% HF 66.7% 60.0% 70.6%
Initial or repeat HT2 tests, single stimulus (adjusted p value on second test) 0.05 then 0.025 7.4% 0.0% MF 82.1% 65.2% 93.9%
0.0% HF 70.4% 60.0% 76.5%

The theoretical FPR has been calculated based on the number of tests and α level, as described in the main text.

CAEP, cortical auditory evoked potential; FPR, false positive rate; HF, (mid-)high-frequency (stimulus); HT2, Hotellings T2; MF, mid-frequency (stimulus); SL, sensation level.