Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1976 Aug;60(8):568–572. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.8.568

A comparison of the pupilloconstrictor effect of pilocarpine solution administered to the conjunctival sac as a single drop or as a continuous infusion in normal subjects.

A T Birmingham, N R Galloway, S A Spencer
PMCID: PMC1042750  PMID: 9970

Abstract

Pilocarpine was administered into the conjunctival sac of normal volunteers by single-drop administration or by continuous infusion of a solution to the inner canthus by means of a fine Silastic tube. Using pupilloconstriction as a measure of response it was shown that infusion with a 0-01 per cent solution of pilocarpine was as effective as a single drop of 0-5 per cent pilocarpine. The response to the single drop was faster at onset. It was demonstrated that at pH 7-2 pilocarpine was more effective than at acid pH. The infusion method is simple to use, comfortable for long periods, has potential for reducing the need for frequent drop administration and for reducing the total amount of drug administered, and could be used for drugs other than pilocarpine.

Full text

PDF
570

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. A., Cowle J. B. Influence of pH on the effect of pilocarpine on aqueous dynamics. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968 Aug;52(8):607–611. doi: 10.1136/bjo.52.8.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LIPPAS J. CONTINUOUS IRRIGATION IN THE TREATMENT OF EXTERNAL OCULAR DISEASES. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964 Feb;57:298–305. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(64)91839-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tan B. G. Oklahoma eye irrigating tube. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1970 Mar-Apr;74(2):435–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES