Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 16;41(10):1474–1482. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01662-6

Table 1.

Validation of CHM13 assemblies.

Asm NG50 (Mb) #Errors Quast / VerityMap %Comp Mismatch
/100 kb
Indel
/100 kb
Resolved BACs T2T >95%

Verkko 135.13 21 / 20 99.75 2.46 0.61 644 / 644 12 17
Verkko (HiFi) 70.13 17 / 20 99.42 2.17 0.55 629 / 644 1 3
LJA 96.69 12 / 29 99.60 2.14 0.85 639 / 644 6 9
Flye 69.53 114 / 30 93.58 6.03 110.92 511 / 644 0 0
Hifiasm 90.22 32 / 39 99.54 2.55 0.70 643 / 644 2 5

We used the published reference of CHM13v1.1 14 to evaluate the assemblies with QUAST and ran VerityMap as a reference-free alternative. The relative assembler ranking between QUAST and VerityMap shows good agreement, only switching LJA and Verkko in terms of fewest errors. %Comp: chromosome completeness as measured by QUAST alignments. Number of mismatches and Indels reported by QUAST are given per 100 kb. T2T: reports complete chromosomes with a single unitig covering >99% of the reference bases and having canonical telomeres on each end. >95%: reports chromosomes with a single unitig covering >95% of the reference with no requirement for telomeres. QUAST errors intersecting known heterozygous variants or errors 37, as well as those within the core rDNA arrays, were excluded using a filter script from Shafin et al. 4. CHM13 reference BACs were evaluated as in Nurk et al. 8. Canonical telomeres were identified using the VGP pipeline 10. The best result for each coverage level and category is highlighted in bold.