Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 16;131(8):087009. doi: 10.1289/EHP10831

Figure 4.

Figure 4 is a line graph, plotting whole pregnancy and the preterm birth risk, ranging from 0.00 to 0.63 in increments of 0.63; 0.3 to 1.25 in increments of 0.62; 1.25 to 1.88 in increments of 0.63; 1.88 to 2.50 in increments of 0.62; 2.50 to 3.13 in increments of 0.63; 3.13 to 3.75 in increments of 0.62; 3.75 to 4.38 in increments of 0.63; 4.38 to 5.00 in increments of 0.62 (y-axis) across average temperature, ranging from negative 10 to 30 in increments of 5 (x-axis).

The relationship between the average temperature exposed during the whole pregnancy and the preterm birth risk in China Labor and Delivery Survey (n=70,818). (See Tables S9 for corresponding numeric data.) Note: Cox proportional hazard regression incorporated with penalized cubic spline was used to examine exposure-response associations. HRs represent a 1-unit increase in extreme weather events and are presented with a 95% CI. All models were adjusted for maternal age, maternal ethnicity, maternal education, insurance type, child sex, parity, GDP per capita, geographic region, conception season, conception year, PM2.5, and O3. CI, confidence interval; GDO, gross domestic product; HR, hazard ratio; PM2.5, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter 2.5μm.