Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;2016(3):CD005563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005563.pub3

Comparison 4. Prophylactic melatonin versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Incident delirium 3 529 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.41 [0.09, 1.89]
2 Duration of delirium 1 104 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [‐0.57, 0.57]
3 Severity of delirium (binary severe vs. not severe) 1 104 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.58, 1.27]
4 Severity of delirium (DRS‐R‐98) 1 6 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐4.10 [‐19.47, 11.27]
5 Length of admission 2 500 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.09 [‐1.20, 1.39]
6 Cognitive impairment 1 378 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.70, 1.04]
7 Activities of daily living 1 369 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [‐1.20, 1.20]
8 Use of psychotropic medication (binary) 1 122 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.64, 1.18]
9 Antipsychotic medication use (cumulative) 1 378 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.0 [‐1.79, ‐0.21]
10 Benzodiazepine use (cumulative) 1 378 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐11.60 [‐24.34, 1.14]
11 Withdrawal from study 2 165 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.15, 6.87]
12 In‐hospital mortality 3 543 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.37, 1.88]
13 Mortality by 3 months 1 378 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.67, 1.45]
14 Adverse events 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]