Table 3.
Comparison of measurement models.
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | Δχ2/Δdf | IFI | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline model | 794.972 | 246 | 3.232 | – | 0.920 | 0.910 | 0.920 | 0.091 | 0.060 |
Three factors -GI + MAR | 1258.091 | 296 | 4.250 | 69.815 | 0.871 | 0.858 | 0.871 | 0.109 | 0.068 |
Three factors -DC + GI | 1995.485 | 296 | 6.742 | 115.982 | 0.773 | 0.750 | 0.772 | 0.145 | 0.103 |
Three factors -CEON + DC | 2765.339 | 296 | 9.342 | 101.040 | 0.670 | 0.636 | 0.669 | 0.175 | 0.253 |
Two factors -GI + MAR,CEON + DC | 2973.303 | 298 | 9.978 | 104.799 | 0.642 | 0.609 | 0.641 | 0.182 | 0.254 |
Two factors GI + DC,MAR + CEON | 2467.712 | 298 | 8.281 | 170.033 | 0.710 | 0.683 | 0.709 | 0.164 | 0.175 |
One factors | 1780.800 | 170 | 10.475 | 662.193 | 0.672 | 0.632 | 0.671 | 0.187 | 0.105 |
CEON = CEO Narcissism; MAR = Top Management Risk Aversion; DC = Dynamic Capability; GI = Green Innovation.
Note: This table provides confirmatory factor analysis which shows our model fit is acceptable.