Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 3;9(8):e18898. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18898

Table 3.

Comparison of measurement models.

Model χ2 df χ2/df Δχ2df IFI TLI CFI RMSEA SRMR
Baseline model 794.972 246 3.232 0.920 0.910 0.920 0.091 0.060
Three factors -GI + MAR 1258.091 296 4.250 69.815 0.871 0.858 0.871 0.109 0.068
Three factors -DC + GI 1995.485 296 6.742 115.982 0.773 0.750 0.772 0.145 0.103
Three factors -CEON + DC 2765.339 296 9.342 101.040 0.670 0.636 0.669 0.175 0.253
Two factors -GI + MAR,CEON + DC 2973.303 298 9.978 104.799 0.642 0.609 0.641 0.182 0.254
Two factors GI + DC,MAR + CEON 2467.712 298 8.281 170.033 0.710 0.683 0.709 0.164 0.175
One factors 1780.800 170 10.475 662.193 0.672 0.632 0.671 0.187 0.105

CEON = CEO Narcissism; MAR = Top Management Risk Aversion; DC = Dynamic Capability; GI = Green Innovation.

Note: This table provides confirmatory factor analysis which shows our model fit is acceptable.