Table 2. Predictors considered and selected for the final models.
Overall survival | Recurrence-free survival | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Final model | Global P value: 2.583e-08 | Global P value: 6.005e-06 | ||
Survival probability is 1 at baseline, which is the date of surgery | Survival probability is 1 at baseline, which is the date of surgery | |||
Predictor variables | Pooled coefficient | Predictor variables | Pooled coefficient | |
1. Bilirubin (>35 μmol/L) pre-hepatectomy | 2.31 | 1. Bilirubin (>35 μmol/L) pre-hepatectomy | 1.46 | |
2. Extrahepatic Metastasis detected on PET-scan | 0.41 | 2. CEA pre-hepatectomy (>200 ng/mL) | 0.51 | |
3. CEA pre-hepatectomy (>200 ng/mL) | 0.25 | 3. Neoadjuvant treatment for CRLM | 0.43 | |
4. Neoadjuvant treatment for CRLM | 0.28 | 4. Extrahepatic Metastasis detected on PET-scan | 0.30 | |
5. CRC N stage | 0.25 | 5. CRC N stage | 0.30 | |
6. KRAS mutation status | 0.18 | 6. KRAS mutation status | 0.18 | |
7. Charlson Comorbidity Score | 0.17 | 7. Charlson Comorbidity Score | 0.12 | |
8. CRLM largest tumor diameter | 0.06 | 8. CRLM largest tumor diameter | 0.06 | |
Other non-0 predictors from LASSO regression excluded from the final model | 1. Adjuvant Chemotherapy following CRLM resection | 1. Adjuvant Chemotherapy following CRLM resection | ||
2. Number of CRLM | 2. Number of CRLM | |||
3. CRLM lymphovascular invasion | 3. Number CRLM >3 (Nordlinger) | |||
4. Largest CRLM tumor diameter on PET-scan | 4. CRLM lymphovascular invasion | |||
5. CRC # of lymph nodes | 5. Bilobar CRLM on PET-scan | |||
6. CRC lymphovascular invasion | 6. CRC lymphovascular invasion | |||
7. CRC resection margin | 7. CRC resection margin | |||
8. Disease free interval >1 year (Fong Score) | 8. Disease Free interval >1 year (Fong Score) | |||
9. Laparoscopic hepatectomy | 9. Laparoscopic hepatectomy |
LASSO, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator; PET, positron emission-tomography; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CRLM, colorectal liver metastases; CRC, colorectal cancer.