TABLE 3.
Results of the pairwise and network meta‐analysis of CMS (MD, 95% CI)
| SA | 2.34 (−3.21, 7.88) | 6.26 (−1.52, 14.04) | 2.25 (−3.38, 7.88) | 5.91 (0.58, 11.24) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1, 4.00 (−4.39, 12.39) | EB | 3.92 (−2.36, 10.20) | −0.09 (−3.18, 3.00) | 3.57 (0.71, 6.43) |
| TG | −4.01 (−9.79, 1.76) | −0.35 (−6.08, 5.38) | ||
| N = 2, −0.36 (−1.19, 0.47) | N = 1, −3.20 (−8.92, 2.52) | TR | 3.66 (1.47, 5.85) | |
| N = 2, 8.03 (−4.06, 20.12) | N = 5, 3.66 (0.30, 7.02) | N = 1, −1.00 (−5.28, 3.28) | N = 9, 3.83 (0.99, 6.67) | HP |
Note: Upper‐right triangle shows the results of the network meta‐analysis. Lower‐left triangle shows the results of the pairwise meta‐analyses. The N represents the numbers of studies which compared the two interventions directly. For MD with 95%CI, a negative MD favor the lower‐right intervention. For OR with 95%CI, a OR >1 favor the lower‐right intervention. Statistically significant findings are shaded.
Abbreviations: CCD, coracoclavicular distance; CI, confidence interval; CMS, Constant–Murley Score; EB, EndoButton; HP, hook plates; MD, mean difference; OR, odd ratio; SA, suture anchors; TG, tendon grafts; TR, Tight‐Rope; VAS, visual analog scale.