TABLE 4.
Results of the pairwise and network meta‐analysis of VAS (MD, 95% CI)
| SA | 0.32 (−0.26, 0.90) | 0.28 (−0.76, 1.32) | 0.37 (−0.09, 0.83) | −0.02 (−0.43, 0.40) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EB | −0.04 (−1.08, 0.99) | 0.05 (−0.40, 0.50) | −0.34 (−0.74, 0.05) | |
| TG | 0.09 (−0.89, 1.08) | −0.30 (−1.26,0.66) | ||
| N = 1, 0.00 (−1.39, 1.39) | N = 1, 0.50 (−0.49, 1.49) | TR | −0.39 (−0.63, −0.16) | |
| N = 2, 0.03 (−0.08, 0.14) | N = 2, −0.40 (−0.54, −0.26) | N = 1, −0.30 (−6.33, 5.73) | N = 8, −0.39 (−0.65, −0.14) | HP |
Note: Upper‐right triangle shows the results of the network meta‐analysis. Lower‐left triangle shows the results of the pairwise meta‐analyses. The N represents the numbers of studies which compared the two interventions directly. For MD with 95%CI, a negative MD favor the lower‐right intervention. For OR with 95%CI, a OR >1 favor the lower‐right intervention. Statistically significant findings are shaded.
Abbreviations: CCD, coracoclavicular distance; CI, confidence interval; CMS, Constant–Murley Score; EB, EndoButton; HP, hook plates; MD, mean difference; OR, odd ratio; SA, suture anchors; TG, tendon grafts; TR, Tight‐Rope; VAS, visual analog scale.