Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;7(16):4366–4370. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010113

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Patients (n = 31) n (% or range)
Sex
 Male 18 (58.1)
 Female 13 (41.9)
Diagnosis
 Advanced MDS 4 (23.5)
 Relapsed AML 11 (35.5)
 Refractory AML 7 (22.6)
 Postcytotoxic therapy MDS/AML 9 (29.0)
Age, y, median (range) 10.2 (1.3-17.4)
Extramedullary disease
 No 29 (93.5)
 Yes 2 (6.5)
BM blast at diagnosis, median (range) 25% (0-95)
BM blasts before the first venetoclax therapy, median (range) 20% (0-80)
Previous lines of therapies since last complete response, median (range) 3 (1-7)
 0 4 (23.5)
 1 3 (17.6)
 2 2 (11.8)
 ≥ 2 8 (45.1)
Previous HSCT
 0 18 (58.1)
 1 9 (29.0)
 2 4 (12.9)
Unfavorable genetics
 KMT2A rearrangements 8 (25.8)
 - 7/del7q 6 (19.3)
 FLT3-ITD 5 (16.1)
 Complex karyotype 2 (6.5)
 KRAS 2 (6.5)
 PTPN11 1 (3.2)
No. of venetoclax cycles per patient, median (range) 2 (1-15)
Best response achieved
CR 16 (51.6)
PR 6 (19.4)
ORR 22 (71.0)
NR 8 (25.8)
TF 1 (3.2)
No. of cycles to best response (in 22 responders), median, range 1 (1-7)

ORR, overall response rate.

Five with morphological CR; 4 who tested flow cytometry-minimal residual disease negative; 2 who tested polymerase chain reaction-minimal residual disease negative (with extramedullary complete remission detected upon fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and skin biopsy in 1 case); and 5 with CR with incomplete recovery.