Table 2.

Differences between corresponding clusters when obtained by Daura, Cnn and UMAPLnk. Values represent dbi_kl evaluated via Eq.(6) and t_kl (in parenthesis) obtained via Eq.(8). Results reflect what is visually evident from Fig. 14. Larger values of dbi_kl and likewise smaller values of t_kl indicate better agreement between methods. Note that UMAPLnk produced not more than 2 clusters, and hence only the first two clusters of each method were included in the comparison.

dbikl(tkl)		cluster 1		cluster 2
		Cnn	UMAPLnk	Cnn	UMAPLnk
cutoff = 0.05 nm	Daura	1.78 (288)	1.83 (273)	0.17 (896)	0.33 (1182)
	Cnn	0	24.68 (73)	0	1.05 (563)
cutoff = 0.1 nm	Daura	9.06 (170)	8.99 (171)	0.83 (1095)	0.83 (1099)
	Cnn	0	217 (8.66)	0	149 (20.8)