Abstract
A small group of glaucoma patients with scotomata were compared with normal coevals. Plots were obtained of the error of each measurement as a function of retinal illumination. A statistical analysis shows the limitations of perimetry as a monitor of the progress of glaucoma. The significance of the data is discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Armaly M. F. The visual field defect and ocular pressure level in open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1969 Feb;8(1):105–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drance S. M., Wheeler C., Pattullo M. The use of static perimetry in the early detection of glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1967 Oct;2(4):249–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HARMS H., AULHORN E. [Comparative studies on the value of quantitative perimetry, skiaskotometry and fusion frequency for the recognition of beginning visual field disorders in glaucoma]. Doc Ophthalmol. 1959;13:303–356. doi: 10.1007/BF00157929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verriest G., Israel A. Application du périmètre statique de Goldmann au relève topographique des seuils différentiels de luminance pour de petits objets colorés projétés sur un fond blanc. I. Principles, calibrage de l'appareil et étude comparative de groupes de sujets normaux d'âges différents. Vision Res. 1965 Apr;5(3):151–174. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90063-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]