Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 19;125(3):571–589. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000426

Table 2. Multigroup RSiena Coevolution Models.

Effect Model 1 Model 2
Est. SE p Est. SE p
Note. The behavioral dynamics models perceived discrimination and the network dynamics models friendship choices. Model 1 tests contact effects and the corresponding selection effects. Model 2 tests contact effects, socialization effects, and the corresponding selection effects. Models include the effects for structural controls and White students shown in online Appendix C. Est. = estimate; SE = standard error. N = 1,170. Ethnicity coded as 1 = White, 2 = Asian. Gender coded as 1 = boy, 2 = girl.
* p < .05.
Behavioral dynamics
 Asian students
  Number of ingroup friends 0.01 0.02 .838 −0.01 0.02 .761
  Number of outgroup friends −0.05 0.03 .123 −0.04 0.03 .205
  Ingroup friends’ perceived discrimination 0.16* 0.07 .026
  Outgroup friends’ perceived discrimination 0.22 0.64 .732
 Controls
  Linear shape 0.20* 0.10 .049 0.27* 0.10 .009
  Quadratic shape −0.17* 0.02 <.001 −0.07 0.05 .112
  Ethnicity −0.09 0.22 .696 −0.16 0.24 .506
  Gender −0.02 0.04 .662 −0.01 0.04 .947
Network dynamics
 Asian students
  Ego Perceived Discrimination × Ingroup Friends −0.01 0.01 .348 −0.01 0.01 .332
  Ego Perceived Discrimination × Outgroup Friends −0.03 0.03 .231 −0.03 0.03 .279
  Ingroup friends’ perceived discrimination similarity 0.02 0.08 .788
  Outgroup friends’ perceived discrimination similarity 0.14 0.22 .534
 Controls
  Alter ethnicity −0.13* 0.02 <.001 −0.13* 0.02 <.001
  Ego ethnicity 0.12* 0.02 <.001 0.11* 0.02 <.001
  Same ethnicity 0.24* 0.02 <.001 0.24* 0.02 <.001
  Alter gender −0.01 0.02 .861 −0.01 0.02 .877
  Ego gender 0.05* 0.02 .028 0.05* 0.02 .027
  Same gender 0.60* 0.02 <.001 0.60* 0.02 <.001