Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;11(4):e00133-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00133-23

TABLE 4.

Pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin in neutropenic rats infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 following single i.v. administrations as bolus and infusionsa

Treatment Mean ± SD P. aeruginosa burden (log10 CFU/g thigh [reductionb])
i.v. bolus 30-min i.v. infusion 1-h i.v. infusion
Infection control (2 h PI) 6.13 ± 0.22 NA NA
Vehicle control (26 h PI) 8.47 ± 0.13 NA NA
Ciprofloxacin, 26 h PIc (mg/kg)
 10 6.5 ± 0.11d 6.6 ± 0.12 d,e 7.66 ± 0.2f,g
 30 5.3 ± 0.28h (0.83) 5.2 ± 0.08h,i (0.93) 4.2 ± 0.2h,j (1.9)
 100 2.2 ± 0.18h (3.9) 1.86k (4.3) BLOQ
a

NA, not applicable; PI, post infection; BLOQ, below the limit of quantitation.

b

Values in parentheses indicate the mean reduction in bacterial burden compared to that of the 2-h PI control at 24 h posttreatment.

c

26 h PI is equivalent to 24 h posttreatment.

d

Not significantly different compared to 2-h PI control (P < 0.05).

e

Not significantly different compared to 10 mg/kg i.v. bolus (P > 0.05).

f

Significantly different compared to 10 mg/kg i.v. bolus (P < 0.05).

g

Significantly different from vehicle control (P < 0.05).

h

Significantly different compared to 2-h PI control (P < 0.05).

i

Not significantly different compared to 30 mg/kg i.v. bolus (P > 0.05).

j

Significantly different compared to 30 mg/kg i.v. bolus (P < 0.05).

k

Mean (n = 2).