Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2023 Jun 21;11(4):e01403-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01403-23

Reduced Susceptibility to Azoles in Cryptococcus gattii Correlates with the Substitution R258L in a Substrate Recognition Site of the Lanosterol 14-α-Demethylase

Silvia Katherine Carvajal a, Javier Melendres b,*, Patricia Escandón a, Carolina Firacative b,
Editor: Alexandre Alanioc
PMCID: PMC10434158  PMID: 37341584

ABSTRACT

Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii cause cryptococcosis, a life-threatening fungal infection affecting mostly immunocompromised patients. In fact, cryptococcal meningitis accounts for about 19% of AIDS-related deaths in the world. Because of long-term azole therapies to treat this mycosis, resistance to fluconazole leading to treatment failure and poor prognosis has long been reported for both fungal species. Among the mechanisms implicated in resistance to azoles, mutations in the ERG11 gene, encoding the azole target enzyme lanosterol 14-α-demethylase, have been described. This study aimed to establish the amino acid composition of ERG11 of Colombian clinical isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii and to correlate any possible substitution with the in vitro susceptibility profile of the isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole. Antifungal susceptibility testing results showed that C. gattii isolates are less susceptible to azoles than C. neoformans isolates, which could correlate with differences in the amino acid composition and structure of ERG11 of each species. In addition, in a C. gattii isolate with high MICs for fluconazole (64 μg/mL) and voriconazole (1 μg/mL), a G973T mutation resulting in the substitution R258L, located in substrate recognition site 3 of ERG11, was identified. This finding suggests the association of the newly reported substitution with the azole resistance phenotype in C. gattii. Further investigations are needed to determine the exact role that R258L plays in the decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and voriconazole, as well as to determine the participation of additional mechanisms of resistance to azole drugs.

IMPORTANCE The fungal species Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii are human pathogens for which drug resistance or other treatment and management challenges exist. Here, we report differential susceptibility to azoles among both species, with some isolates displaying resistant phenotypes. Azoles are among the most commonly used drugs to treat cryptococcal infections. Our findings underscore the necessity of testing antifungal susceptibility in the clinical setting in order to assist patient management and beneficial outcomes. In addition, we report an amino acid change in the sequence of the target protein of azoles, which suggests that this change might be implicated in resistance to these drugs. Identifying and understanding possible mechanisms that affect drug affinity will eventually aid the design of new drugs that overcome the global growing concern of antifungal resistance.

KEYWORDS: Colombia, cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, ERG11, fluconazole resistance, antimicrobial resistance, azole resistance, voriconazole

INTRODUCTION

Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii are encapsulated basidiomycetous yeasts that can cause cryptococcosis, affecting the lungs and, more frequently, the central nervous system (CNS) (1, 2). C. neoformans, which causes the majority of cases worldwide, primarily infects immunocompromised patients, mostly people living with HIV (PLHIV), but also cancer patients receiving chemotherapy as well as recipients of solid-organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants (35). C. gattii, conversely, which accounts for less than 20% of cases globally, was long considered to infect immunocompetent hosts or those with unidentified risk factors (6). However, in the last decade, subtle alterations in people’s immunity, such as anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies, have been detected in most patients affected by this species (7, 8).

Annually, the global incidence of cryptococcal meningitis is estimated to be 152,000 cases, with ~54% of cases in sub-Saharan Africa alone, resulting in 112,100 deaths. This accounts for approximately 19% of AIDS-related mortality (9). In Colombia, the incidence of cryptococcosis has been estimated to be 0.23 case per million people in the general population, while this value increases to 1.1 cases per thousand PLHIV, with mortality rates of almost 50% (10). Although C. neoformans causes the majority of cases of cryptococcosis (~96%) in the country, C. gattii has long been recognized as an endemic pathogen. Notably, infection by this species usually needs longer periods and higher doses of antifungal treatment, requires additional clinical follow-up, and leaves more neurological sequelae (6, 11).

Treatment for cryptococcal infection remains a challenge due to the few therapeutic options currently available. Only three classes of antifungals, polyenes, flucytosine, and azoles, are used to treat this mycosis (12). For the first phase of treatment (induction), the combination of amphotericin B deoxycholate with 5-fluorocytosine presents favorable results (13). However, the toxicity of amphotericin B deoxycholate limits its use, and although there is a less toxic formulation of this polyene, the high price restricts its availability, as it occurs with 5-fluorocytosine (14, 15). Fluconazole, which can be used alone or in combination with 5-fluorocytosine in the induction phase, is as well the antifungal of choice for the consolidation and maintenance phases, which together can last up to 1 year (13). In addition, fluconazole is often used as monotherapy in the induction phase in countries with limited resources, including Colombia, and it is recommended as primary prophylaxis in HIV-positive adults and adolescents with CD4 counts less than 100 cells/μL (1315). Despite its wide use, fluconazole is much less effective in eliminating fungi from the cerebrospinal fluid, due to its fungistatic nature, and has poorer clinical outcomes than does the amphotericin B-based induction regimen (16, 17). Furthermore, associated with its prolonged use, isolates with heteroresistance and decreased susceptibility to fluconazole have long been reported, leading to therapeutic failure and suboptimal outcomes (1821).

Fluconazole and other triazoles interact with the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase (ERG11), a cytochrome P450 enzyme encoded by the ERG11 gene and responsible for catalyzing the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol, which leads to impaired cell membrane integrity and functionality (22). Even though the mechanisms implicated in resistance to azoles remain poorly understood, increased or decreased expression and mutations in the ERG11 gene, as well as aneuploidy and overexpression of the membrane efflux pump proteins, have been described for cryptococcal isolates with reduced susceptibility to these antifungal drugs (2325). Regarding amino acid substitution in ERG11, particularly, G484S has been reported for C. neoformans with MIC values for fluconazole of ≥16 μg/mL (26, 27). Other substitutions in ERG11 that may confer decreased susceptibility to azoles have been identified in C. neoformans, such as Y145F, conferring resistance to voriconazole (28), G344S (corresponding to G417S), found in multiazole-resistant isolates (29), G470R, identified in two clinical isolates with the fluconazole resistance phenotype (30), and I99V, detected in isolates with high MICs for fluconazole (16 to 24 μg/mL) (31, 32). To our knowledge, in C. gattii, only the substitution N249D, which was suggested to correlate with azole resistance, has been reported (33).

Considering that in Colombia, cryptococcal isolates with high MIC values for fluconazole and other triazoles have been reported (34) and that the antifungal susceptibility varies between and within C. neoformans and C. gattii (35, 36), this study aimed to help elucidate some of the molecular mechanisms that might be implicated in azole resistance. To achieve this, the ERG11 genes of clinical isolates of both etiological agents of cryptococcosis were sequenced, to correlate ERG11 amino acid composition and any possible amino acid substitutions with the in vitro antifungal susceptibility of the isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole. Identifying and understanding how substitutions in antifungal targets affect drug affinity will eventually aid design of new drugs that overcome the growing concern of antifungal resistance.

RESULTS

C. gattii isolates are less susceptible to azoles than C. neoformans isolates.

Antifungal susceptibility testing with fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole allowed us to determine that the majority of studied isolates were distributed among the wild-type population of the species, per antifungal drug (Table 1). However, of the 31 C. neoformans isolates, 1 was identified as voriconazole non-wild type, 1 as itraconazole non-wild type, and 1 as simultaneously non-wild type to both azoles, since they presented a MIC that is higher than the epidemiological cutoff value that encompasses more than 99% of the wild-type population (ECV >99%) for these azoles (Table 1). Of the 19 C. gattii isolates, 8 (42.1%) were identified as voriconazole-non-wild-type isolates. Of these 8 isolates, 1 (5.3%) was, in addition, a fluconazole-non-wild-type isolate (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Distribution of the MIC of clinical Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii isolates from Colombia

Antifungal Species n GMb MIC (μg/mL) No. of isolates with indicated MIC (μg/mL)a
0.03 0.06 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64
Fluconazolec C. neoformans 31 5.231 1 4 10 14 2
C. gattii 19 9.958 1 3 6 8 0 1
Voriconazolec C. neoformans 31 0.2138 2 0 11 10 6 2
C. gattii 19 0.5378 1 4 6 8
Itraconazole C. neoformans 31 0.1999 20 3 6 2
C. gattii 19 0.2500 7 6 5 1
a

Modes are underlined. Non-wild-type isolates, as established elsewhere (38), are highlighted.

b

GM, geometric mean.

c

Statistically significant differences between species (P < 0.05) were found.

When comparing the geometric mean MICs among species, per antifungal tested, it was found that statistically, C. gattii isolates were less susceptible to fluconazole (9.958 μg/mL versus 5.231 μg/mL; P = 0.0025) and voriconazole (0.5378 μg/mL versus 0.2138 μg/mL; P = 0.0001) than C. neoformans isolates. Moreover, C. gattii had a higher geometric mean MIC for itraconazole than C. neoformans, even though this difference was not statistically significant (0.2500 μg/mL versus 0.1999 μg/mL; P = 0.1502).

The correlation between MICs for fluconazole and voriconazole was strong in C. neoformans (ρ = 0.5040; P = 0.0038). In addition, the correlation between MICs for voriconazole and itraconazole was strong in C. neoformans (ρ = 0.7293) and fair in C. gattii (ρ = 0.4931) (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0319, respectively). However, no other associations between antifungals were found in any species.

ERG11 amino acid composition and structure differ between C. neoformans and C. gattii.

Among the 31 C. neoformans isolates studied, two different ERG11 protein sequences of 547 amino acids were identified. In 28 (90.3%) isolates, the amino acid composition was the same as that for the reference strains of C. neoformans var. grubii, H99 (GenBank accession no. AEQ63271) and INM 972624 (GenBank accession no. AAP12370), reported as fluconazole susceptible (26, 33). In the remaining 3 isolates (9.7%), a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), A393G, resulting in an amino acid substitution of isoleucine 99 for valine (I99V), was detected. These two amino acids have strongly similar biochemical properties; therefore, the substitution was classified as conservative (37).

Among the 19 C. gattii isolates studied, four different ERG11 protein sequences of 550 amino acids were identified. Compared with the C. neoformans reference strains, H99 and INM 972624, all C. gattii isolates presented in common 14 amino acid substitutions and three amino acids extra in the C-terminal region (QEV) (Fig. 1). Most of these substitutions were classified as conservative (F18Y, A24T, V30L, V32I, V43I, V105I, K256R, I307V, Q349E, S404A, and S460T), one as semiconservative (S293G), and two as nonconservative (C45G, P191S) (37). Of the four proteins identified in C. gattii, two were from VGII and two from VGIII isolates. In the 15 VGII isolates, four additional amino acid substitutions were identified (Q50H and K58R [conservative] and P21H and A196I [nonconservative]), and, except for one isolate, a fifth extra conservative substitution, L42F, was detected. In the four VGIII isolates, apart from the common 14 amino acid substitutions and QEV in the C-terminal region already mentioned, three extra amino acid substitutions were identified (Q7R and L42F [conservative] and V8A [semiconservative]). From the four VGIII isolates, an additional nonconservative substitution, R258L, was identified in one isolate (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Complete alignment of the six different sequences of the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase found in 31 Cryptococcus neoformans and 19 Cryptococcus gattii isolates from Colombia. Two protein sequences were identified in this study in C. neoformans and are represented by the VNI isolates H0058-I-2527 and H0058-I-2846. Four protein sequences were identified in C. gattii and are represented by the VGII isolates H0058-I-3407 and H0058-I-7498 and the VGIII isolates H0058-I-7316 and H0058-I-7746. Amino acid substitutions, compared to the reference strain C. neoformans var. grubii INM 972624 (GenBank accession no. AAP12370), are highlighted in different colors. Amino acids of the three substrate recognition sites are written in green and heme binding sites in orange (39). Residues that are identical among all isolates are indicated with asterisks. Colons and periods indicate conservation between groups of strongly (conservative) and weakly (semiconservative) similar properties, respectively.

The levels of identity between the reference strains and the two proteins identified in C. neoformans were 100% and 99.82%, whereas the levels of identity between the reference strains and the four proteins identified in C. gattii were 96.53% and 96.71% for the VGII isolates and 96.71% and 96.89% for the VGIII isolates (Fig. 1). Structural modeling of the ERG11 proteins identified in the studied C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates revealed various differences in their structures (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

C. gattii with high MICs for fluconazole and voriconazole harbors the substitution R258L in ERG11.

Antifungal susceptibility testing allowed the identification of a C. gattii VGIII isolate, H0058-I-7316, with a MIC for fluconazole of 64 μg/mL and a MIC for voriconazole of 1 μg/mL. This indicates that the isolate does not distribute among the wild-type population of the molecular type VGIII for either of the azoles. Notoriously, the MIC for fluconazole was 2 dilutions higher than the ECV >99% for this drug for this molecular type, which is 16 μg/mL (38). Sequencing of the ERG11 gene of this isolate (GenBank accession no. OP868692) detected an SNP, G973T, resulting in an amino acid substitution of arginine 258 for leucine (R258L), which is located in substrate recognition site 3 (SRS3), which was recently identified in cryptococcal species and other Tremellomycetes (39). In the cytochrome P450s of other yeasts and filamentous fungi, SRS3, conformed by nine residues, is rather conserved between groups, and this substitution has not been reported (Fig. 2). Apart from R258L, no other additional substitutions previously reported in C. neoformans, C. gattii, Candida albicans, Candida auris, and Aspergillus fumigatus, and which have been related with decreased susceptibility or resistance to azole drugs, were identified in the studied C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates (Fig. S2) (4049).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Alignment of 42 amino acid residues of the cytochrome P450s from reference strains of Aspergillus fumigatus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida albicans, Candida auris, and the Tremellomycetes Trichosporon asahii, Tremella mesenterica, Cryptococcus neoformans H99, and Cryptococcus gattii CDCR265, together with the fluconazole-resistant isolate C. gattii H0058-I-7316. Amino acids of substrate recognition site 3 (SRS3) are shown in green (39). The substituted residue of C. gattii H0058-I-7316 at position 258 is shown in red. Residues that are identical among all the species are indicated with asterisks. Colons and a period indicate conservation between groups of strongly (conservative) and weakly (semiconservative) similar properties, respectively.

Structural modeling of the ERG11 proteins from the reference strains of C. neoformans, INM 972624, and C. gattii, H0058-I-7316, pointed out notable differences in their structures, considering the different amino acid compositions between species (96.71% identity), and revealed the substitution at position 258 (Fig. 3).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Structural modeling of conformational differences of the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase from Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii INM 972624 (A) and Cryptococcus gattii H0058-I-7316 (B), indicating the nonconservative R258L amino acid substitution.

DISCUSSION

C. neoformans and C. gattii are pathogens for which drug resistance or other treatment and management challenges exist; hence, these are currently ranked in the list of fungal priority pathogens to focus attention on their perceived public health importance (50). A large survey carried out with almost 5,000 cryptococcal isolates from around the world revealed an overall prevalence of fluconazole resistance of 12%, with a prevalence lower in incident isolates (10.6%) than in relapse isolates (24.1%) (51). In Colombia specifically, between 14% and 57% of C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates have been reported to have MICs for fluconazole above the ECVs (ranging from ≥16 to ≥64 μg/mL), including isolates from patients with treatment failure and relapse (34, 52, 53). In particular, resistance to fluconazole in these yeasts is most commonly arising given that patients undergo long-term azole consolidation and maintenance therapies (26, 28, 54). Moreover, in low-resource settings, where there are fewer therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of cryptococcosis, fluconazole is also used as monotherapy in the induction phase (2, 23, 55). The use of fluconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis in the prevention of cryptococcal meningitis further drives the uncontrolled use of this azole, which could also potentially lead to the development of antifungal resistance (13). Recently, the exposure to azole pesticides used in agriculture was as well reported to be responsible for the appearance of resistance to medical azoles in C. neoformans, as has been well documented for other environmental pathogenic fungi, such as A. fumigatus (56).

Since there are no clinical breakpoints for C. neoformans and C. gattii, the establishment of MIC values and ECVs not only aids in determination of differential antifungal profiles among species or molecular types but also serves as an early indication of the emergence of isolates with acquired mechanisms of resistance to a particular antifungal drug (38). In this study, C. gattii isolates were less susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole, with a trend to be as well less susceptible to itraconazole, than C. neoformans isolates. These findings coincide with several studies that revealed differential susceptibilities to azole drugs depending on species and molecular types (3436) and studies showing the generally low susceptibility of C. gattii to azole-based antifungals, especially fluconazole (5760). Interestingly, this might be associated with the differences in the protein compositions found between these sibling species, as C. gattii proteins differed from those of C. neoformans at 17 or more amino acids, including three extra residues (QEV) in the C-terminal region. Although the major mechanisms implicated in azole resistance are diverse, differential ERG11 compositions between C. neoformans and C. gattii have been described not only for VGII and VGIII isolates, as in the case of our study, but also for other VGII and VGI isolates (33). Our findings highlight, therefore, the importance of testing antifungal susceptibility of cryptococcal species when treating cryptococcosis, especially in recurrent isolates from patients with treatment failure, and encourage additional studies to establish the association between high MICs of azoles and treatment doses, duration of therapy, and clinical prognosis of patients.

The identification of non-wild-type isolates to azoles, through antifungal susceptibility testing, allowed us as well to further characterize some of the molecular basis of resistance to these drugs, which have been extensively studied in C. albicans (4042, 6164), C. auris (48, 49), and A. fumigatus (4347, 64, 65), but not in C. neoformans (2332), and to a lesser extent in C. gattii (33, 60). Particularly, sequencing of the ERG11 genes of the studied isolates led to the identification of a newly reported mutation (G973T), resulting in the amino acid substitution R258L in a C. gattii isolate with high MICs for fluconazole and voriconazole, two structurally similar azoles that consist of short side chains. Although it is uncertain how the mutation R258L directly contributes to the decreased susceptibility of the studied isolate to both triazoles, previous studies on C. neoformans, C. albicans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown that the substitutions G484S, G464S, and Y140F/H in each species, respectively, are responsible for conformational changes in the 14-α-demethylase, which might decrease its affinity to azole drugs (63, 6668). Arginine (R), a positively charged, polar amino acid, frequently plays an important role in structure, as it is quite frequent in protein active or binding sites. Consequently, a nonconservative change for leucine (L), an aliphatic, hydrophobic amino acid, could be disfavored, since leucine can play a role in substrate recognition rather than being directly involved in protein function (37). Moreover, structural modeling of the protein harboring the mutation R258L shows various conformational differences from proteins of azole-susceptible isolates. Until now, none of the residues of substrate recognition site 3 (SRS3), where the mutation R258L is located, had been reported to be associated with resistance to azoles in other yeasts or filamentous fungi, yet there are reports of residue changes playing a role in azole resistance in other SRSs (39, 64). The substitutions Y132F, Y132H, and F126L in C. albicans (40, 41, 48) as well as F126T and Y132F in C. auris (48), which are all located in SRS1, have been described for isolates that are resistant to azoles and have even been considered potential predictive markers of azole resistance in these ascomycetous yeasts (62). Moreover, the substitution Y135F in C. neoformans and its equivalent Y136F in Histoplasma capsulatum, both in SRS1, have also been described as conferring resistance to the short-tailed triazoles, fluconazole and voriconazole (28, 69).

Regarding other substitutions reported to be associated with azole resistance, three of the C. neoformans isolates studied were found to harbor the conservative missense mutation, I99V, previously identified in C. neoformans isolates with MICs for fluconazole ranging between 16 and 24 μg/mL (31, 32). However, in the Colombian isolates with this mutation, the MICs of fluconazole were rather low (1, 4, and 8 μg/mL, respectively), which suggests that amino acid polymorphism is not always sufficient to predict azole susceptibility (33, 62). A substitution of amino acids with strongly similar properties, such as I99V, has been suggested to be unlikely to lead to disruption in function of the 14-α-demethylase but instead could result in changes in the levels of ERG11 expression (32). Another conservative substitution, S460T, has been detected in both fluconazole-resistant and fluconazole-susceptible C. neoformans isolates, showing once again that mutations are not always linked to decreased fluconazole susceptibility (28, 70). In C. auris, amino acid substitutions that are not associated with antifungal resistance have been suggested to likely represent genetically evolved clade differences (71).

Similarly, the identification of voriconazole- and itraconazole-non-wild-type isolates that do not harbor any substitution that correlates with decreased susceptibility to azoles in cryptococcal species and other yeasts and filamentous fungi suggests that not only variations in ERG11 coding sequences are responsible for the high azole MICs observed in these fungal pathogens and that there must be different mechanisms that contribute to azole resistance (33, 60, 70). Nevertheless, reduced susceptibility to voriconazole and itraconazole must be surveyed, since these azoles, although they are less effective, could be used as primary or salvage therapies when fluconazole is not available, when resistance appears, in cases of patient intolerance or drug toxicity, or among patients with refractory cryptococcosis (72).

To conclude, this study shows differential susceptibilities to azoles among C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates, with some presenting high MICs for the assessed drugs, which underscores the necessity of in vitro susceptibility testing of clinical isolates against different groups of azoles in order to assist patient management. This study also revealed a C. gattii isolate with high MICs for both fluconazole and voriconazole harboring a nonconservative amino acid substitution, R258L, located in SRS3 of the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase, which suggests the association of this substitution with the phenotype of decreased susceptibility to these triazoles, although the possibility of participation of other parallel molecular mechanisms of resistance to azoles cannot be ruled out and needs to be examined. Further experiments, such as reverse genetics and whole-genome sequencing, could help explore other mechanisms associated with the reduced susceptibility or resistance phenotype of the studied isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolates.

Thirty-one and 19 clinical isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii, respectively, recovered between 2005 and 2019 from cerebrospinal fluid (94%), blood (4%), and skin lesions (2%) from 50 patients were studied. Among the patients, only 17 (34%) had data on antifungal treatment. Of these, 12 (24%) received monotherapy with amphotericin B and 1 (2%) with fluconazole, while 4 (8%) received combined therapy with these two antifungals. Among the isolates, 21 were recovered from Antioquia, 10 from Norte de Santander, 6 from Valle del Cauca, 5 from Bogota, 2 from Meta, and 1 each from Atlántico, Boyacá, Cauca, Cesar, Cundinamarca, and Santander as part of the National Surveillance Program for Cryptococcus and Cryptococcosis led by the Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS), in Bogotá, Colombia. All isolates had data on species and molecular type, determined by glycine assimilation on l-canavanine–glycine–bromothymol blue medium and URA5 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), respectively, as previously reported (73, 74). All C. neoformans isolates were VNI, while among the C. gattii isolates, 15 were VGII and 4 were VGIII. Isolates, maintained in 10% glycerol at −80°C, were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar and incubated for 48 h at 35°C prior to antifungal susceptibility testing and DNA extraction.

Antifungal susceptibility to azoles.

The MICs of fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole was determined for all studied isolates, using broth microdilution and following the M27M44S guideline of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (75). Plates were incubated at 35°C and read after 72 h. Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as quality control strains. The ranges of drug concentrations tested by 2-fold serial dilutions were 0.25 to 128 μg/mL for fluconazole and 0.03125 to 16 μg/mL for voriconazole and itraconazole. Mode and geometric mean MICs were calculated per drug and species. MIC values were compared with ECV >99%, when available, to determine if the isolates distributed among the wild-type population of each species or molecular type, per drug, as established elsewhere (38).

Etest for fluconazole was performed for one isolate of C. gattii, H0058-I-7316, which presented a high MIC for this antifungal, in order to corroborate decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and to visualize its growth in solid medium (Fig. S3). Etest was also done for the quality control strains, C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019. Briefly, 90-mm-diameter plates containing solidified RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with 2% glucose, at a depth of 4.0 mm, were inoculated with a cell suspension adjusted spectrophotometrically to the turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland, by using a cotton swab. After the inoculum was absorbed completely into the agar, an Etest strip (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) was placed on each plate. The plates were incubated at 35°C and read at 24 and 48 h. The MIC was established as the lowest concentration at which the border of the elliptical inhibition zone intercepted the scale on the Etest strip. Any growth, such as microcolonies, throughout a discernible inhibition ellipse was ignored (76).

Determination of the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase amino acid composition.

Genomic DNA of all isolates was extracted as described previously (77). Amplification of the ERG11 gene was done as reported before (26), with some modifications. For C. neoformans isolates, the primers CnERG11A (5′-TCGTCGAACCATCTTTCG-3′) and CnERG11B (5′-CGTCTATGACTTCATGACC-3′) were used (26). However, for C. gattii isolates, the forward primer CnERG11A was used together with a new reverse primer, CgERG11R (5′-CGTCTATTAATTTCTGACT-3′), which was designed in this study. All primers were synthesized by Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea. PCRs were carried out in 50-μL reaction volumes containing 1× Taq buffer, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), a 0.5 μM concentration of each primer, and 10 ng of genomic DNA. Thermocycling conditions consisted of 1 cycle of initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 58°C, and 2 min at 72°C, and 1 final cycle of 10 min at 72°C. After amplification, PCR products of ~2,200 bp were commercially purified and sequenced, both forward and reverse strands, by Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea.

Sequences were edited and contigs were assembled using Sequencher 5.4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). DNA alignments, annotation, and translation to amino acids were done using the program MEGA 11 (78). The reference strains of C. neoformans var. grubii, H99 (GenBank accession no. AEQ63271) and INM 972624 (GenBank accession no. AAP12370), reported as fluconazole susceptible (26, 33), were used to annotate the obtained sequences and to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and amino acid substitutions. An additional alignment with the cytochrome P450 sequences from Aspergillus fumigatus (GenBank accession no. AAK73659 and AAK73660), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (GenBank accession no. AAA34546), Candida glabrata (GenBank accession no. AAB02329), Candida tropicalis (GenBank accession no. AAA53284), Candida albicans (GenBank accession no. AAF00598), Candida auris (GenBank accession no. QBC74785), Trichosporon asahii 1742, Tremella mesenterica 38441 (33), and C. gattii molecular type VGII, strain CDCR265 (GenBank accession no. AEQ63272), was also carried out to identify amino acid substitutions related with azole resistance in other yeasts and filamentous fungi.

Multiple-sequence alignments were carried out using Clustal Omega, and the percent identity between proteins was calculated by Clustal 2.1 (79).

Structural modeling of the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase.

With the two types of proteins identified in C. neoformans and the four in C. gattii, structural modeling was carried out using one-to-one threading to model the sequences against an in-house structure in the Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction, and analysis (80). For this, chain A of the experimental structure (PBD code 4LXJ) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae lanosterol 14-α-demethylase with lanosterol bound (81) was used. The files generated in Phyre2 were visualized using EzMol, a web server for the rapid visualization of protein structure (82).

Statistical analysis.

MIC differences between species were compared, per drug, by using the Mann-Whitney test. Association between MICs of fluconazole and voriconazole, fluconazole and itraconazole, and voriconazole and itraconazole were assessed, per species, using the Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ). Correlation was judged very strong at values from 1 to 0.8, strong from 0.8 to 0.5, fair from 0.5 to 0.2, and poor from 0.2 to 0. Alpha risk was set to 5% (α = 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad (La Jolla, CA, USA) Prism v 9.4.1.

Data availability.

Nucleotide sequences of all studied isolates were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: OP823165 to OP823195 for C. neoformans and OP868674 to OP868692 for C. gattii.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the National Reference Laboratory of the National Institutes of Health for allowing the use of the strains. We also thank the public health laboratories in Colombia that take part in the National Surveillance Program of Cryptococcus and Cryptococcosis as well as the clinicians and epidemiologists of the participating hospitals.

Carolina Firacative was supported by small grant no. IV-FPC014 from the Dirección de Investigación e Innovación, Universidad del Rosario.

We report no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Fig. S1 to S3. Download spectrum.01403-23-s0001.docx, DOCX file, 5.4 MB (5.4MB, docx)

Contributor Information

Carolina Firacative, Email: cfiracative@gmail.com.

Alexandre Alanio, Institut Pasteur.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Maziarz EK, Perfect JR. 2016. Cryptococcosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:179–206. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kwon-Chung KJ, Fraser JA, Doering TL, Wang Z, Janbon G, Idnurm A, Bahn YS. 2014. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4:a019760. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mitchell TG, Perfect JR. 1995. Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS—100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:515–548. doi: 10.1128/CMR.8.4.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pappas PG. 2013. Cryptococcal infections in non-HIV-infected patients. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 124:61–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Firacative C, Carvajal SK, Escandon P, Lizarazo J. 2020. Cryptococcosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a rare presentation warranting recognition. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2020:3713241. doi: 10.1155/2020/3713241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen SC, Meyer W, Sorrell TC. 2014. Cryptococcus gattii infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:980–1024. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00126-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rosen LB, Freeman AF, Yang LM, Jutivorakool K, Olivier KN, Angkasekwinai N, Suputtamongkol Y, Bennett JE, Pyrgos V, Williamson PR, Ding L, Holland SM, Browne SK. 2013. Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. J Immunol 190:3959–3966. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saijo T, Chen J, Chen SC, Rosen LB, Yi J, Sorrell TC, Bennett JE, Holland SM, Browne SK, Kwon-Chung KJ. 2014. Anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies are a risk factor for central nervous system infection by Cryptococcus gattii in otherwise immunocompetent patients. mBio 5:e00912-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00912-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rajasingham R, Govender NP, Jordan A, Loyse A, Shroufi A, Denning DW, Meya DB, Chiller TM, Boulware DR. 2022. The global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcal infection in adults in 2020: a modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 22:1748–1755. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00499-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Escandón P, Lizarazo J, Agudelo CI, Castañeda E. 2018. Cryptococcosis in Colombia: compilation and analysis of data from laboratory-based surveillance. J Fungi (Basel) 4:32. doi: 10.3390/jof4010032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lizarazo J, Escandon P, Agudelo CI, Firacative C, Meyer W, Castaneda E. 2014. Retrospective study of the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Cryptococcus gattii infections in Colombia from 1997–2011. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e3272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mourad A, Perfect JR. 2018. The war on cryptococcosis: a review of the antifungal arsenal. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 113:e170391. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760170391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.WHO. 2022. Guidelines for diagnosing, preventing and managing cryptococcal disease among adults, adolescents and children living with HIV. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Loyse A, Dromer F, Day J, Lortholary O, Harrison TS. 2013. Flucytosine and cryptococcosis: time to urgently address the worldwide accessibility of a 50-year-old antifungal. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2435–2444. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perfect JR, Bicanic T. 2015. Cryptococcosis diagnosis and treatment: what do we know now. Fungal Genet Biol 78:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van der Horst CM, Saag MS, Cloud GA, Hamill RJ, Graybill JR, Sobel JD, Johnson PC, Tuazon CU, Kerkering T, Moskovitz BL, Powderly WG, Dismukes WE. 1997. Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 337:15–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707033370103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schiave LA, Nascimento E, Vilar FC, Haes TM, Takayanagui OM, Gaitani CM, Martinez R. 2018. Fluconazole levels in serum and cerebrospinal fluid according to daily dosage in patients with cryptococcosis and other fungal infections. Braz J Infect Dis 22:11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sionov E, Chang YC, Garraffo HM, Kwon-Chung KJ. 2009. Heteroresistance to fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans is intrinsic and associated with virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2804–2815. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00295-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mpoza E, Rhein J, Abassi M. 2018. Emerging fluconazole resistance: implications for the management of cryptococcal meningitis. Med Mycol Case Rep 19:30–32. doi: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moreira I, Cortez ACA, de Souza ÉS, Pinheiro SB, de Souza Oliveira JG, Sadahiro A, Cruz KS, Matsuura ABJ, Melhem M, Frickmann H, de Souza JVB. 2022. Investigation of fluconazole heteroresistance in clinical and environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans complex and Cryptococcus gattii complex in the state of Amazonas, Brazil. Med Mycol 60:myac005. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myac005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Firacative C. 2023. Antifungal resistance: a growing concern. Acta Biol Colomb, in Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scorzoni L, de Paula ESAC, Marcos CM, Assato PA, de Melo WC, de Oliveira HC, Costa-Orlandi CB, Mendes-Giannini MJ, Fusco-Almeida AM. 2017. Antifungal therapy: new advances in the understanding and treatment of mycosis. Front Microbiol 8:36. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Iyer KR, Revie NM, Fu C, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2021. Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:454–466. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cheong JW, McCormack J. 2013. Fluconazole resistance in cryptococcal disease: emerging or intrinsic? Med Mycol 51:261–269. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.715763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bermas A, Geddes-McAlister J. 2020. Combatting the evolution of antifungal resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 114:721–734. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rodero L, Mellado E, Rodriguez AC, Salve A, Guelfand L, Cahn P, Cuenca-Estrella M, Davel G, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2003. G484S amino acid substitution in lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase (ERG11) is related to fluconazole resistance in a recurrent Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3653–3656. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3653-3656.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bosco-Borgeat ME, Mazza M, Taverna CG, Cordoba S, Murisengo OA, Vivot W, Davel G. 2016. Amino acid substitution in Cryptococcus neoformans lanosterol 14-alpha-demethylase involved in fluconazole resistance in clinical isolates. Rev Argent Microbiol 48:137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sionov E, Chang YC, Garraffo HM, Dolan MA, Ghannoum MA, Kwon-Chung KJ. 2012. Identification of a Cryptococcus neoformans cytochrome P450 lanosterol 14alpha-demethylase (Erg11) residue critical for differential susceptibility between fluconazole/voriconazole and itraconazole/posaconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1162–1169. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05502-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kano R, Okubo M, Hasegawa A, Kamata H. 2017. Multi-azole-resistant strains of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii isolated from a FLZ-resistant strain by culturing in medium containing voriconazole. Med Mycol 55:877–882. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gago S, Serrano C, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuesta I, Martin-Mazuelos E, Aller AI, Gomez-Lopez A, Mellado E. 2017. Molecular identification, antifungal resistance and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus deneoformans isolated in Seville, Spain. Mycoses 60:40–50. doi: 10.1111/myc.12543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Selb R, Fuchs V, Graf B, Hamprecht A, Hogardt M, Sedlacek L, Schwarz R, Idelevich EA, Becker SL, Held J, Kupper-Tetzel CP, McCormick-Smith I, Heckmann D, Gerkrath J, Han CO, Wilmes D, Rickerts V. 2019. Molecular typing and in vitro resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates obtained in Germany between 2011 and 2017. Int J Med Microbiol 309:151336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.151336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Albehaijani SHI, Macreadie I, Morrissey CO, Boyce KJ. 2022. Molecular mechanisms underlying the emergence of polygenetic antifungal drug resistance in msh2 mismatch repair mutants of Cryptococcus. JAC Antimicrob Resist 4:dlac033. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gast CE, Basso LR, Jr, Bruzual I, Wong B. 2013. Azole resistance in Cryptococcus gattii from the Pacific Northwest: investigation of the role of ERG11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5478–5485. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02287-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Firacative C, Escandon P. 2021. Antifungal susceptibility of clinical Cryptococcus gattii isolates from Colombia varies among molecular types. Med Mycol 59:1122–1125. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myab041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chong HS, Dagg R, Malik R, Chen S, Carter D. 2010. In vitro susceptibility of the yeast pathogen Cryptococcus to fluconazole and other azoles varies with molecular genotype. J Clin Microbiol 48:4115–4120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01271-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Trilles L, Meyer W, Wanke B, Guarro J, Lazera M. 2012. Correlation of antifungal susceptibility and molecular type within the Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii species complex. Med Mycol 50:328–332. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2011.602126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Betts MJ, Russell RB. 2003. Amino acid properties and consequences of substitutions, p 289–316. In Barnes MR, Gray IC (ed), Bioinformatics for geneticists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, England. doi: 10.1002/0470867302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Espinel-Ingroff A, Aller AI, Canton E, Castanon-Olivares LR, Chowdhary A, Cordoba S, Cuenca-Estrella M, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Govender N, Hagen F, Illnait-Zaragozi MT, Johnson E, Kidd S, Lass-Florl C, Lockhart SR, Martins MA, Meis JF, Melhem MS, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Schell WA, St-Germain G, Trilles L, Turnidge J. 2012. Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5898–5906. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01115-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Akapo OO, Macnar JM, Krys JD, Syed PR, Syed K, Gront D. 2021. In silico structural modeling and analysis of interactions of Tremellomycetes cytochrome P450 monooxygenases CYP51s with substrates and azoles. Int J Mol Sci 22:7811. doi: 10.3390/ijms22157811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Feng W, Yang J, Xi Z, Qiao Z, Lv Y, Wang Y, Ma Y, Wang Y, Cen W. 2017. Mutations and/or overexpressions of ERG4 and ERG11 genes in clinical azoles-resistant isolates of Candida albicans. Microb Drug Resist 23:563–570. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mane A, Vidhate P, Kusro C, Waman V, Saxena V, Kulkarni-Kale U, Risbud A. 2016. Molecular mechanisms associated with fluconazole resistance in clinical Candida albicans isolates from India. Mycoses 59:93–100. doi: 10.1111/myc.12439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Warrilow AG, Mullins JG, Hull CM, Parker JE, Lamb DC, Kelly DE, Kelly SL. 2012. S279 point mutations in Candida albicans sterol 14-alpha demethylase (CYP51) reduce in vitro inhibition by fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2099–2107. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05389-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bader O, Weig M, Reichard U, Lugert R, Kuhns M, Christner M, Held J, Peter S, Schumacher U, Buchheidt D, Tintelnot K, Gross U, MykoLabNet DP, MykoLabNet-D Partners . 2013. cyp51A-based mechanisms of Aspergillus fumigatus azole drug resistance present in clinical samples from Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3513–3517. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00167-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ballard E, Melchers WJG, Zoll J, Brown AJP, Verweij PE, Warris A. 2018. In-host microevolution of Aspergillus fumigatus: a phenotypic and genotypic analysis. Fungal Genet Biol 113:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen P, Liu M, Zeng Q, Zhang Z, Liu W, Sang H, Lu L. 2019. Uncovering new mutations conferring azole resistance in the Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A gene. Front Microbiol 10:3127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Leonardelli F, Theill L, Nardin ME, Macedo D, Dudiuk C, Mendez E, Gamarra S, Garcia-Effron G. 2017. First itraconazole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolate harbouring a G54E substitution in Cyp51Ap in South America. Rev Iberoam Micol 34:46–48. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mellado E, Garcia-Effron G, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2004. Substitutions at methionine 220 in the 14alpha-sterol demethylase (Cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus are responsible for resistance in vitro to azole antifungal drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2747–2750. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2747-2750.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, Colombo AL, Calvo B, Cuomo CA, Desjardins CA, Berkow EL, Castanheira M, Magobo RE, Jabeen K, Asghar RJ, Meis JF, Jackson B, Chiller T, Litvintseva AP. 2017. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis 64:134–140. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li J, Coste AT, Liechti M, Bachmann D, Sanglard D, Lamoth F. 2023. Novel ERG11 and TAC1b mutations associated with azole resistance in Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e02663-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02663-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.WHO. 2022. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bongomin F, Oladele RO, Gago S, Moore CB, Richardson MD. 2018. A systematic review of fluconazole resistance in clinical isolates of Cryptococcus species. Mycoses 61:290–297. doi: 10.1111/myc.12747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Agudelo CA, Munoz C, Ramirez A, Tobon AM, de Bedout Bact C, Cano LE, Restrepo A. 2015. Response to therapy in patients with cryptococcosis and AIDS: association with in vitro susceptibility to fluconazole. Rev Iberoam Micol 32:214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Torres I, Gallo JE, Gomez OM, Rua-Giraldo A, McEwen JG, Garcia AM. 2022. Gene expression profiles of ERG11, MDR1 and AFR1 in Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubbi from HIV patients. Biomedica 42:697–706. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.6519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Paugam A, Dupouy-Camet J, Blanche P, Gangneux JP, Tourte-Schaefer C, Sicard D. 1994. Increased fluconazole resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from a patient with AIDS and recurrent meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 19:975–976. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.5.975-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Brandt ME, Pfaller MA, Hajjeh RA, Hamill RJ, Pappas PG, Reingold AL, Rimland D, Warnock DW, Cryptococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group . 2001. Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the United States: 1992 to 1994 and 1996 to 1998. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3065–3069. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3065-3069.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Drakulovski P, Krasteva D, Bellet V, Randazzo S, Roger F, Pottier C, Bertout S. 2023. Exposure of Cryptococcus neoformans to seven commonly used agricultural azole fungicides induces resistance to fluconazole as well as cross-resistance to voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole and isavuconazole. Pathogens 12:662. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12050662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gomez-Lopez A, Zaragoza O, Dos Anjos Martins M, Melhem MC, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2008. In vitro susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii clinical isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:727–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Grizante BP, Tonani L, Cocio TA, Martinez R, Nascimento E, von Zeska Kress MR. 2020. Molecular typing, in vitro susceptibility and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii species complex clinical isolates from south-eastern Brazil. Mycoses 63:1341–1351. doi: 10.1111/myc.13174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Trilles L, Fernández-Torres B, Lazéra MdS, Wanke B, Guarro J. 2004. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii. J Clin Microbiol 42:4815–4817. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4815-4817.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bertout S, Roger F, Drakulovski P, Martin AS, Gouveia T, Kassi F, Menan H, Krasteva D, Delaporte E, Bellet V. 2020. African ST173 Cryptococcus deuterogattii strains are commonly less susceptible to fluconazole: an unclear mechanism of resistance. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 21:262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xiang M-J, Liu J-Y, Ni P-H, Wang S, Shi C, Wei B, Ni Y-X, Ge H-L. 2013. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res 13:386–393. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Morio F, Loge C, Besse B, Hennequin C, Le Pape P. 2010. Screening for amino acid substitutions in the Candida albicans Erg11 protein of azole-susceptible and azole-resistant clinical isolates: new substitutions and a review of the literature. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 66:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sanglard D, Ischer F, Koymans L, Bille J. 1998. Amino acid substitutions in the cytochrome P-450 lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51A1) from azole-resistant Candida albicans clinical isolates contribute to resistance to azole antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:241–253. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.2.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang J, Li L, Lv Q, Yan L, Wang Y, Jiang Y. 2019. The fungal CYP51s: their functions, structures, related drug resistance, and inhibitors. Front Microbiol 10:691. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hargrove TY, Wawrzak Z, Lamb DC, Guengerich FP, Lepesheva GI. 2015. Structure-functional characterization of cytochrome P450 sterol 14alpha-demethylase (CYP51B) from Aspergillus fumigatus and molecular basis for the development of antifungal drugs. J Biol Chem 290:23916–23934. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.677310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kelly SL, Lamb DC, Loeffler J, Einsele H, Kelly DE. 1999. The G464S amino acid substitution in Candida albicans sterol 14α-demethylase causes fluconazole resistance in the clinic through reduced affinity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 262:174–179. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sheng C, Miao Z, Ji H, Yao J, Wang W, Che X, Dong G, Lu J, Guo W, Zhang W. 2009. Three-dimensional model of lanosterol 14 alpha-demethylase from Cryptococcus neoformans: active-site characterization and insights into azole binding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3487–3495. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01630-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sagatova AA, Keniya MV, Wilson RK, Sabherwal M, Tyndall JDA, Monk BC. 2016. Triazole resistance mediated by mutations of a conserved active site tyrosine in fungal lanosterol 14α-demethylase. Sci Rep 6:26213. doi: 10.1038/srep26213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wheat LJ, Connolly P, Smedema M, Durkin M, Brizendine E, Mann P, Patel R, McNicholas PM, Goldman M. 2006. Activity of newer triazoles against Histoplasma capsulatum from patients with AIDS who failed fluconazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:1235–1239. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Atim PB, Meya DB, Gerlach ES, Muhanguzi D, Male A, Kanamwanji B, Nielsen K. 2022. Lack of association between fluconazole susceptibility and ERG11 nucleotide polymorphisms in Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates from Uganda. J Fungi (Basel) 8:508. doi: 10.3390/jof8050508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Healey KR, Kordalewska M, Jimenez OC, Singh A, Berrio I, Chowdhary A, Perlin DS. 2018. Limited ERG11 mutations identified in isolates of Candida auris directly contribute to reduced azole susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01427-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01427-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen MH, Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:291–322. doi: 10.1086/649858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Meyer W, Castañeda A, Jackson S, Huynh M, Castañeda E, Group ICS, IberoAmerican Cryptococcal Study Group . 2003. Molecular typing of IberoAmerican Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Emerg Infect Dis 9:189–195. doi: 10.3201/eid0902.020246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Castañeda E, Lizarazo J, Firacative C. 2018. Criptococosis, p 157–173. In González A, Gómez BL, Tobón A, Restrepo A (ed), Fundamentos de las micosis humanas, 1st ed. CIB—Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.CLSI. 2022. Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 3rd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller M, Erwin ME, Jones RN. 1996. Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose. J Clin Microbiol 34:848–852. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.848-852.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ferrer C, Colom F, Frases S, Mulet E, Abad JL, Alio JL. 2001. Detection and identification of fungal pathogens by PCR and by ITS2 and 5.8S ribosomal DNA typing in ocular infections. J Clin Microbiol 39:2873–2879. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2873-2879.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE. 2015. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Monk BC, Tomasiak TM, Keniya MV, Huschmann FU, Tyndall JD, O’Connell JD, III, Cannon RD, McDonald JG, Rodriguez A, Finer-Moore JS, Stroud RM. 2014. Architecture of a single membrane spanning cytochrome P450 suggests constraints that orient the catalytic domain relative to a bilayer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3865–3870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324245111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Reynolds CR, Islam SA, Sternberg MJE. 2018. EzMol: a web server wizard for the rapid visualization and image production of protein and nucleic acid structures. J Mol Biol 430:2244–2248. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Fig. S1 to S3. Download spectrum.01403-23-s0001.docx, DOCX file, 5.4 MB (5.4MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Nucleotide sequences of all studied isolates were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: OP823165 to OP823195 for C. neoformans and OP868674 to OP868692 for C. gattii.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES