Table 3.
A complete summary of the key data extracted from studies of balance exercise intervention.
References | Participants | Interventions modality | Duration | Outcomes | Summary of results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arghavani et al. (50) | 60 (men only) Age 65–80 |
|
8 weeks |
|
- Significant ↑ in Balance confidence in both training programs |
Arnold et al. (39) | 28 (women and men) Age ≥ 65 |
|
9 weeks |
|
- Significant improvement in STST for both interventions - No significant improvement in MoS for both interventions |
El-Khoury et al. (42) | 706 (women only) Age 75–85 |
|
2 years |
|
- Significant improvements in all balance and gait tests at one and 2 years |
Hamed et al. (53) | 63 (women and men) Age 65–80 |
|
14 weeks |
|
- Significant improvements for MoS and knee and ankle momentum in muscle strength group -Significant improvement for LoS, MoS and ankle momentum muscle strength group |
Hirase et al. (43) | 93 (65 women, 28 men) Age > 65 |
|
4 months |
|
- Significant ↑time (Improvement) in OLST on foam rubber, but not significant in stable surfaces - Significant ↓time (Improvement) in CST and TUGT for both intervention groups - Significant ↑time (Improvement) in TST for both intervention groups |
Kocaman et al. (48) | 42 (women and men) Age > 65 |
|
8 weeks |
|
- Significant improvements in composite balance score and ADT for both interventions |
Okubo et al. (57) | 44 (25 women, 19 men) Age 65–90 |
|
1 week |
|
- Significant ↓ in all falls and slip falls, but not significant in trip falls |
Rieger et al. (47) | 30 (women and men) Age > 65 |
|
1 week | Local divergence exponent for anterior–posterior: local dynamic stability Local divergence exponent for medio-lateral: local dynamic stability |
- Significant differences for all outcome measures in the intervention group |
Sadeghi et al. (60) | 64 (men only) Age ≥ 65 |
|
8 weeks |
|
- No significant difference in muscle strength - Significant ↑ time (Improvement) in SLST -Significant ↑ time (Improvement) in TST - Significant ↓time (Improvement) in TUGT (improvement) - Significant ↓ time (Improvement) in 10mWT |
Sitthiracha et al. (62) | 60 (53 women, 7 men) Age 65 to 75 |
|
8 weeks |
|
- Significant ↓ time (Improvement) in TUGT - No significant improvement in OLST - Significant ↓ time (Improvement) in FTSST - Significant ↑ steps (Improvement) in 2MST |
Zhao et al. (64) | 61 (42 women, 19 men) Age 65–74 |
|
16 weeks |
|
- Significant improvement in FRT and m-CTSIB |
Zhao et al. (65) | 61 (42 women, 19 men) Age 65–74 |
|
16 weeks |
|
- Significant ↑ repetition (Improvement) in 30SCST - Significant ↓ time (Improvement) in UG |
5TSST, Five Times Sit to Stand Test; 10mWT, 10-Meter Walk Test; 30SCST, 30-Second Chair Stand Test; 6 MWT, 6-Minute Walk Test; ABC, Activities Specific Balance Confidence; ADT, Adaptation Test; BoS, Base of support; CST, Chair Standing Test; FRT, Functional Reach Test; LoS, Limits of Stability; m-CTSIB, Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance; MoS, Margin of Stability; OLST, One Leg Standing Test; SLST, Single Leg Stance Test; STST, Sit To Stand Test; TST, Tandem Stance Tet; TUGT, Timed Up and Go Test, UG, 8 ft Up-and-Go Test.