Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;12:e86327. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86327

Figure 5. Brain network involved during processing of ToM compared to Random Frith-Happé’s animations in both humans (A) and marmosets (B).

Group functional maps showing significant greater activations for ToM animations compared to Random animations. (A) Group map obtained from 10 human subjects displayed on the left and right human cortical flat maps. The white line delineates the regions based on the recent multi-modal cortical parcellation atlas (Glasser et al., 2016). (B) Group map obtained from 6 marmosets displayed on the left and right marmoset cortical flat maps. The white line delineates the regions based on the Paxinos parcellation of the NIH marmoset brain atlas (Liu et al., 2018). The brain areas reported in A and B have activation threshold corresponding to z-scores >2.57 (yellow/red scale) or z-scores <–2.57 (purple/green scale) (AFNI’s 3dttest++, cluster-forming threshold of p<0.01 uncorrected and then FWE-corrected α=0.05 at cluster-level from 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations).

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Subcortical activations during processing of Frith-Happé’s ToM and Random animations in humans (left) and marmosets (right).

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Group subcortical functional maps showing significant greater activations for ToM condition (A), Random condition (B) and the comparison between ToM and Random conditions (C). Group maps displayed on coronal slices obtained from ten humans (left side) and 6 marmosets (right side). The brain areas reported have activation threshold corresponding to z-scores>3.29 (AFNI’s 3dttest++, threshold of p<0.001 uncorrected). CeB, cerebellum; THA-VP, ventroposterior thalamus; THA-DA, dorsoanterior thalamus; THA-VA, ventroanterior thalamus; Amyg, amygdala; Hipp, hippocampus; Pul, pulvinar; SC, superior colliculus; LGN, lateral geniculate nucleus.