Table 3.

The performance of the proposed method is compared to that of other methods.

Authors	Dataset	Accuracy	Sensitivity	Specificity
Das et al.35	Private	0.9320	0.9410	0.8790
Dong et al.17	Private	0.9812	0.9732	0.9870
Diaz et al.36	Private	0.8500	0.9400	0.9870
Gopakumar et al.37	Private	0.9770	0.9810	0.9720
G.Madhu et al.26	NIH	0.9882	0.9836	0.9930
Liang et al.15	NIH	0.9730	0.9690	0.9780
Rajaraman et al.23	NIH	0.9860	0.9810	0.9920
Rahman et al.38	NIH	0.9770	0.9740	0.9790
Proposed method	NIH	0.9935	0.9957	0.9912