Table 2.
Anthropometry and whole-body composition in CN, MCI due to AD, and AD dementia groups upon controlling for age, sex, and GDS score.
| Variables | Total (n = 518)1 | CN (n = 365)1 | MCI due to AD (n = 123)1 | AD dementia (n = 30)1 | MCI due to AD versus CN | AD dementia versus MCI due to AD | AD dementia versus CN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||||||||
| Height [cm] | 159.0 (8.5) | 158.5 (8.2) | 160.3 (9.0) | 159.4 (8.6) | 0.435 (− 0.867, 1.736) | 0.09 | − 1.353 (− 3.822, 1.116) | 0.26 | − 0.918 (− 3.297, 1.460) | 0.18 |
| Weight [kg] | 62.8 (9.6) | 62.8 (9.4) | 63.0 (10.5) | 61.6 (6.9) | − 0.475 (− 2.504, 1.554) | 0.06 | − 1.527 (− 5.376, 2.322) | 0.19 | − 2.002 (− 5.710, 1.706) | 0.25 |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 24.8 (2.9) | 24.9 (2.8) | 24.5 (3.3) | 24.2 (1.9) | − 0.328 (− 1.058, 0.403) | 0.11 | − 0.149 (− 1.535, 1.237) | 0.05 | − 0.477 (− 1.812, 0.858) | 0.17 |
| Body cell mass [%] | 42.9 (5.0) | 42.6 (5.0) | 43.7 (5.0) | 43.1 (5.3) | 0.421 (− 0.536, 1.377) | 0.11 | − 0.993 (− 2.808, 0.822) | 0.26 | − 0.572 (− 2.321, 1.177) | 0.15 |
| Fat mass [%] | 33.2 (7.6) | 33.8 (7.5) | 31.8 (7.6) | 32.7 (7.9) | − 0.825 (− 2.305, 0.655) | 0.14 | 1.590 (− 1.218, 4.398) | 0.27 | 0.765 (− 1.940, 3.470) | 0.13 |
| ECW/TBW | 39.3 (0.7) | 39.2 (0.7) | 39.5 (0.8) | 39.7 (0.6) | 0.177* (0.024, 0.330) | 0.29 | 0.053 (− 0.237, 0.342) | 0.09 | 0.229 (− 0.050, 0.509) | 0.38 |
| Basal metabolic rate [kcal] | 1,275 (173) | 1,268 (171) | 1,297 (179) | 1,268 (160) | 3.193 (− 20.98, 27.36) | 0.03 | − 38.449 (− 84.31, 7.41) | 0.40 | − 35.257 (− 79.43, 8.92) | 0.37 |
ECW/TBW extracellular to total body water ratio.
Mean (SD) of the continuous variables were presented. The mean difference ( (and 95% confidence intervals) between groups were analyzed using estimated marginal means comparison from Generalized Linear Model upon controlling for age, sex, and GDS score. P values were adjusted using multiplicity adjustment Tukey test and denoted by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Effect sizes (Γ) were calculated as suggested by Lakens (2013)41. Bold text indicates a significant mean difference with p < 0.05.