Table 1.
Study and sample characteristics of article selection
Author | Year | Country | Methodology | Perspective | Type of costs | Topic | Patient sample characteristics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cancer type | Cancer stage | Age | Time horizon | |||||||
Ragnarson-Tennvall and Wilking [26] | 1999 | Sweden | Cost-effectiveness | Healthcare sector | Direct medical, direct non-medical | Palliation and chemotherapy comparison | Pancreatic cancer | - | 71 (mean) | Overall survival |
Pasquali et al. [27] | 2002 | Italy | Cost of illness | Payer | Direct medical | Costing | Pancreatic cancer | All stages | 72.1 (mean) | 5 years |
Aristides et al. [28] | 2003 | UK | Cost-effectiveness | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic cancer | II, III and IV | 61/62 (median) | 18 months |
Bachmann et al. [29] | 2003 | UK | Cost-effectiveness | Service provider | Direct medical | Costs, hospital volume and doctor specialization | Pancreatic cancer | - | - | 1 year |
Hjelmgren et al. [30] | 2003 | Sweden | Cost of illness | Healthcare sector | Direct medical, direct non-medical | Costing | Pancreatic cancer | All stages | 66.4 (mean) | Overall survival |
Heinrich et al. [31] | 2005 | Switzerland | Cost–benefit | Service provider | Direct medical | Diagnostics and management strategy | Pancreatic cancer | All stages | 61 (median) | 18 months |
Müller-Nordhorn et al. [32] | 2005 | Germany | Cost of illness | Payer, healthcare sector, society | Direct medical, direct non-medical, indirect | Costing | Pancreatic cancer | All stages | 62 (mean) | 2.5 years |
Ljungman et al. [33] | 2011 | Sweden | Cost-utility | Service provider | Direct medical | Surgery | Exocrine/ampullary pancreatic adenocarcinoma | All stages | 68 (mean) | Overall survival |
Tingstedt et al. [34] | 2011 | Sweden | Cost of illness | Society | Direct medical, indirect | Costing | Pancreatic cancer excluding endocrine cancer | All stages | 74 (median) | Overall survival |
Walczak et al. [35] | 2012 | Poland | Cost-utility (Markov model) | Patient, payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours | All stages | - | Overall survival |
Ansari et al. [36] | 2013 | Sweden | Cost of illness | Society | Direct medical, indirect | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | All stages | 69 (median) | 3 years |
Ljungman et al. [37] | 2013 | Sweden | Cost-utility | Service provider | Direct medical | Palliation regimens comparison | Exocrine/ampullary pancreatic adenocarcinoma | - | 66/69 (mean) | Overall survival |
Carrato et al. [38] | 2015 | Spain | Cost-utility (Markov model) | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic adenocarcinoma | IV | 63 (median) | 10 years |
Cucchetti et al. [39] | 2015 | Italy | Cost-effectiveness (Markov model) | Service provider | Direct medical | Surgery timing | Non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours | All stages | 52 (median) | Overall survival |
Gharaibeh et al. [40] | 2015 | UK | Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility (Markov model) | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic adenocarcinoma | IV | 63 (median) | Overall survival |
Hanly et al. [41] | 2015 | EU, Iceland | Burden of disease | Society | Indirect | Productivity loss | Pancreatic cancer | All stages | < 65 | 1 year |
Joergensen et al. [42] | 2016 | Denmark | Cost-effectiveness | Service provider | Direct medical | High risk population screening | Pancreatic cancer | - | 49 (median) | 8 years |
Gurusamy et al. [43] | 2017 | UK | Cost-utility (decision tree model) | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic cancer | - | - | 5 years |
Aronsson et al. [44] | 2018 | Sweden | Cost-effectiveness (Markov model) | Service provider | Direct medical | Management strategies comparison | Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm | - | 65 (mean) | 35 years |
Briggs et al. [45] | 2018 | UK | Cost of illness (simulation model) | Payer | Direct medical | Costing | Pancreatic cancer | - | - | 1 year |
Gharaibeh et al. [46] | 2018 | UK | Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility (Markov model) | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma | IV | > 60 | Overall survival |
Lazzaro et al. [47] | 2018 | Italy | Cost-effectiveness (Markov model) | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic cancer | IV | 62/63 (median) | 4 years |
Mujica-Mota et al. [48] | 2018 | UK | Cost-effectiveness (semi Markov model) | Payer | Direct medical | Chemotherapy regimens comparison | Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours | - | 60 (mean) | 40 years |
Ahola et al. [49] | 2019 | Finland | Cost of illness, cost–benefit | Service provider | Direct medical | Hospital volume and resections | Pancreatic cancer | - | 67 (median) | 90 days |
Morelli et al. [50] | 2019 | Italy | Cost of illness | Service provider | Direct medical | Diagnostics in surveillance follow-up | Pancreatic cyst neoplasm | - | 67 (mean) | 6 years |
Thronicke et al. [51] | 2020 | Germany | Cost-effectiveness | Service provider | Direct medical | Integrative therapy | Pancreatic cancer | IV | 63.7/68.6 (mean) | Overall survival |