Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Health Care Women Int. 2016 Feb 19;37(7):790–801. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2016.1140172

Table 2.

Bivariate analyses: Use of IPV screening or counseling as a strategic response.

Total (N = 109) Used counseling discussion as strategic response (N = 40, 36.7%) Did not use counseling discussion as strategic response (N = 69, 63.3%) p value
Age 42.0 ± 11.9 44.5 ± 10.8 40.6 ± 12.3 .1097
Race
 White, non-Hispanic 96 (89.7) 34 (35.4) 62 (64.6) .7427
 Other 11 (10.3) 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5)
Education level
 Less than college graduate 66 (60.5) 32 (48.5) 34 (51.5) .0022*
 College graduate 43 (39.5) 8 (18.6) 35 (81.4)
Near-poverty
 <125% of poverty guideline 21 (21.0) 12 (57.1) 9 (42.9) .0463*
 >125% of poverty guideline 79 (79.0) 26 (32.9) 53 (67.1)
Insurance status
 Privately insured 75 (68.8) 22 (29.3) 53 (70.7) .0196*
 Public insurance or uninsured 34 (31.2) 18 (52.9) 16 (47.1)
Psychiatric diagnosis
 Yes 48 (44.0) 25 (52.1) 23 (47.9) .0037*
 No 61 (56.0) 15 (24.6) 46 (75.4)
IPV exposure
 Past-year IPV 50 (45.9) 26 (52.0) 24 (48.0) .0028*
 Lifetime IPV 59 (54.1) 14 (23.7) 45 (76.3)
*

p < .05