Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 4;13:1155592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1155592

Table 3.

Analyses of quality-of-life outcomes after four treatment cycles.

Variable Control group (n=30) JK-5G group (n=30) Difference between JK-5G and Control group (95% CI) P a Effect Size c
Scores on quality-of-life measures
FACT-L scale 115.63 ± 11.30 122.57 ± 4.52 6.93(2.43 – 11.43) 0.003 0.805
Lung-cancer subscale 33.60 ± 1.22 33.70 ± 1.71 0.10(-0.67 – 0.87) 0.795 0.067
Trial Outcome Index 74.43 ± 8.15 78.87 ± 3.21 4.43(1.19 –7.67) 0.007 0.715
EORCT QLQ-C30
Functional Scales
Physical Functioning 85.11 ± 21.06 92.45 ± 6.00 7.47(-0.63 – 15.57) 0.071 0.484
Role Functioning 82.78 ± 25.70 100 ± 0 17.23(7.61 – 26.86) 0.001 0.945
Emotional Functioning 90.00 ± 12.26 96.95 ± 4.08 7.00(2.25 – 11.75) 0.005 0.773
Cognitive Functioning 97.22 ± 6.32 98.89 ± 4.23 1.70(-1.14 – 4.54) 0.235 0.301
Social Functioning 82.78 ± 24.95 97.78 ± 8.46 15.10(5.32 – 24.88) 0.003 0.809
Global Health 56.67 ± 14.91 52.78 ± 29.06 -3.97(-16.05 – 8.11) 0.517 0.171
Symptom Scales
Fatigue 9.26 ± 21.06 0 -9.33(-17.26 – -1.41) 0.019 0.622
Nausea and Vomiting 0 0 0 1 0
Pain 13.89 ± 20.57 1.67 ± 5.09 -12.13(-19.99 – -4.27) 0.003 0.811
Dyspnoea 3.33 ± 10.17 4.44 ± 11.52 1.10(-4.46 – 6.66) 0.694 0.102
Insomnia 16.67 ± 25.90 2.22 ± 8.46 -14.47(-24.58 – -4.35) 0.005 0.75
Appetite Loss 11.11 ± 25.27 0 -11.17(-20.65 – -1.68) 0.019 0.622
Constipation 0.00 0.00 0 1 0
Diarrhoea 0.00 0.00 0 1 0
Financial Difficulties 27.78 ± 12.63 12.22 ± 16.34 -15.40(-22.88 – -7.92) <0.01 1.065

Data are presented as means ± SD. CI, confidence interval; FACT-L, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung; EORCT QLQ-C30, European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 3.

a

p-values calculated with the independent-samples Student’s t-tests for continuous variables.

c

Cohen’s d statistic was used to determine effect size, a measure of the difference between two means divided by the standard deviation (in this case, the mean in the JK5G group minus the mean in the control group) divided by a standard deviation for the pooled data. As described in conventional classification, effects bigger than 0.20 are small, those bigger than 0.50 are moderate, and those bigger than 0.80 are large.