Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2020 Sep-Oct;41(5):1333–1348. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000858

Table 5.

Overview of Results Used to Answer Feasibility Questions.

Pre-Intervention Intervention Post-Intervention
Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4 Visit 5 Visit 6 Visit 7
(n = 21) (n = 21) (n = 21) (n = 20) (n = 20) (n = 20) (n = 19)
Assessment of Expected Outcomes
QuickSIN (dB SNR Loss) (SD) 11.8 (6.4) 6.8 (4.7) 5.3 (4.6) *
HHIE-S (SD) 25.1 (8.2) 6.1 (5.1) *
COSI Median Response (1–5)
Degree of Change 4 4 4
Final Ability 4 4 4
International Inventory Mean Total Score (SD)
IOI-HA 30.6 (2.7) 30.4 (3.7)
IOI-AI 27.9 (2.8) 27.4 (2.9)
IOI-SO 31.7 (2.6)
Assessment of Compliance
Visit Completion (%) 100 100 95.2 100 100 90.4
Binaural Data Logging in hours (SD) 8.1 (4.0) 8.0 (3.8) 7.6 (3.4) 7.3 (3.4)
International Inventory Median Response for Question 1 (1–5)
IOI-HA 5 5
IOI-SO (n=9) 5
Assessment of Reasonable Timeline
Mean (minutes) 59.5 75.0 31.5 50.0 35.5
Minimum (minutes) 47 65 28 28 27
Maximum (minutes) 72 85 35 72 54

Note: SD = Standard Deviation,

*

= statistically significant change from pre-intervention to post-intervention; QuickSIN = Quick Speech in Noise Test; ; HHIE-S = Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening version; COSI = Client Oriented Scale of Improvement; I-ACE = Individualized-Active Communication Education; HATs = Hearing Assistive Technologies; RLO = Reusable Learning ObjectsIOI = International Outcome Inventory; HA = Hearing Aids; AI = Alternative Interventions; SO = Significant Other;