Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 18;80(9):258. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-04904-7

Table 2.

Mitochondrial proteins with statistically significant differences in their abundance in untreated and MNNG-treated WT vs. HtrA2/Omi KO MEF [ANOVA of scaled abundances using 5% FDR and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test (5%), and additional pairwise comparison of groups by Student’s t test]

Protein accession Protein description q value ANOVA
− log10 p value
ANOVA significant? t test
WT MNNG/WT KO MNNG/KO WT/KO WT MNNG/
KO MNNG
Q8BGT5 Alanine aminotransferase 2 0.049 3.365 Yes 0.005 0.006
Q9D6S7 Ribosome-recycling factor, mitochondrial 0.053 3.001 Yes 0.006 0.013
P52196 Thiosulfate sulfurtransferase 0.074 2.533 No 0.012 0.017
Q99LD8 N(G),N(G)-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 0.092 2.337 No 0.025
O35680 28S ribosomal protein S12, mitochondrial 0.122 2.404 No 0.014
P58059 28S ribosomal protein S21, mitochondrial 0.176 2.061 No 0.014
Q8R4N0 Citrate lyase subunit beta-like protein, mitochondrial 0.198 1.696 No 0.017
Q8K411-1 Presequence protease, mitochondrial 0.251 1.557 No 0.035
Q99LY9 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 5 0.306 1.247 No 0.037
P02340 Cellular tumor antigen p53 0.805 0.314 No 0.039

Empty cells: differences in the protein abundance between the two sample conditions did not reach statistical significance