Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 4;60(10):2639–2648. doi: 10.1007/s13197-023-05788-y

Table 4.

Effective concentration (EC50) values in antioxidant activities of four Cinnamomum species extracted by different solvents

Solvent DPPH EC50 (mg/mL) ABTS EC50 (mg/mL)
CB CC CL CV CB CC CL CV
80% Ethanol 1.01 ± 0.11bD 4.33 ± 0.10bA 3.11 ± 0.12bB 2.69 ± 0.08bC 0.11 ± 0.00bC 0.39 ± 0.03bA 0.25 ± 0.02bB 0.23 ± 0.01bB
80% Methanol 0.94 ± 0.10bD 3.98 ± 0.14bA 2.68 ± 0.15bB 2.39 ± 0.12cC 0.09 ± 0.01bC 0.33 ± 0.02bA 0.24 ± 0.01bB 0.21 ± 0.01bB
RO water 3.65 ± 0.56aC 20.87 ± 1.51aA 6.29 ± 0.43aB 4.29 ± 0.17aC 0.27 ± 0.03aB 1.05 ± 0.53aA 0.40 ± 0.05aB 0.29 ± 0.02aB
BHA 0.21 ± 0.01 NA
BHT NA 0.04 ± 0.00

Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Mean values with different lower-case superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) within the extracting solvents and different upper-case superscripts in each row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within the species

DPPH 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical assay; ABTS 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) radical assay; BHA butylated hydroxyanisole; BHT butylated hydroxytoluene; NA not applicable; CB C. burmannii; CC C. cassia; CL C. loureiroi; CV C. verum