Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;79(Pt 7):626–632. doi: 10.1107/S205698902300498X

Table 2. Experimental details.

  Fe(CN-2,6-DMP)3-TPCPD Fe(CN-2-Naphth)3-TPCPD
Crystal data
Chemical formula [Fe(C9H9N)3(C29H20O)] [Fe(C11H7N)3(C29H20O)]2·C3H6O
M r 833.81 1857.73
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P c a21 Monoclinic, P21
Temperature (K) 100 100
a, b, c (Å) 16.7473 (3), 12.1998 (2), 20.9668 (4) 15.2471 (1), 19.8604 (1), 15.5785 (1)
α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 90 90, 99.378 (1), 90
V3) 4283.81 (13) 4654.33 (5)
Z 4 2
Radiation type Cu Kα Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 3.16 2.98
Crystal size (mm) 0.14 × 0.03 × 0.02 0.18 × 0.07 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, Pilatus 300K XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, Pilatus 300K
Absorption correction Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2021) Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2021)
T min, T max 0.697, 1.000 0.779, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 33622, 7440, 6449 89473, 18788, 17761
R int 0.081 0.050
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.639 0.636
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.042, 0.109, 1.05 0.036, 0.100, 1.07
No. of reflections 7440 18788
No. of parameters 556 1390
No. of restraints 1 1606
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.36, −0.40 0.28, −0.37
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 1989 quotients [(I +)-(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013) Classical Flack (1983) method preferred over Parsons because s.u. lower
Absolute structure parameter −0.008 (4) −0.004 (2)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2021, 2022), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020).