Table 4.
Results of the logistic regression analysis on the mTESE variable status by the age of LH, FSH, testosterone and overall ultrasound
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Variables | Exp (β) | P value |
|
| |||
| Demographic | Age (Y) | 0.836 | 0.022 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.002 | 0.977 | |
| Testicular size | RT | 1.205 | 0.206 |
| LT | 1.198 | 0.188 | |
| Hormonal profiles | LH(ng/mL) | 0.922 | 0.044 |
| FSH(ng/mL) | 0.942 | 0.039 | |
| Testesterone(ng/mL) | 1.602 | 0.043 | |
| Ultrasonography | Total sono | 1.951 | 0.008 |
|
| |||
Logistic regression data by considering the microtese variable as a dependent variable, the age of LH, FSH, testosterone and overall ultrasound had a significant relationship. Age, LH, and FSH have a significant negative relationship (because the value of exp (β) is less than 1) and testosterone and ultrasonography overall had a positive relationship with microtese. BMI; Body mass index, RT; right testis, LT; Left testis, LH; Luteinizing hormone, and FSH; Follicle-stimulating hormone. Exp (β) shows the superiority ratios for each of the predictor variables.