Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 3;40(11):1617–1623. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w

Table 2.

Comparison of prediction times between RGN2 and AF2, RF, and trRosetta across 330 targets spanning our orphan and de novo protein datasets. RGN2 predictions were performed in batches with maximum permissible batch size set to 128 targets. The trRosetta MSA generation step was not used since none of the targets had known homologous proteins.

Protein length (L) bins (# residues) Total targets Mean protein length (# residues) Mean trRosetta prediction time per structure (s)
Mean AF2 prediction time (s) Mean RF prediction time (s) Mean RGN2 prediction time (ms) Mean RGN2 prediction + refinement time (s)
Distogram 3D-Structure
0<L100 184 37.5 1768 1004 831.5 412.6 2.7 145.2
100<L200 93 148.7 2791 1927 851.6 408.3 2.2 177.4
200<L300 28 258.3 2877 1752 828.4 492.7 3.1 182.3
300<L400 17 333.4 3647 2140 825.6 501.6 5.7 200.5
400>L 8 460.5 4012 3011 841.6 498.6 5.9 229.2