Table 3:
The performance comparison of MOA prediction between KGML-xDTD and different baseline models (e.g., MultiHop and KGML-xDTD w/o DP) based on the test set (described in “Data split” section). The metrics in this table are calculated using path scores and all non-DrugMechDB-matched 3-hop paths between drug and disease as “negative” paths for each true-positive drug–disease pair (see more details in “MOA prediction evaluation method” section)
| Model | MPR | MRR | Hit@1 | Hit@10 | Hit@50 | Hit@100 | Hit@500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MultiHop | 61.400% | 0.027 | 0.017 | 0.042 | 0.067 | 0.118 | 0.345 |
| KGML-xDTD w/o DP | 72.965% | 0.015 | 0.008 | 0.017 | 0.067 | 0.160 | 0.403 |
| KGML-xDTD (ours) | 94.696% | 0.109 | 0.059 | 0.193 | 0.496 | 0.613 | 0.849 |
The abbreviation “w/o DP” in the name of model “KKGML-xDTD w/o DP” represents “without using demonstration paths.”