Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;34(6):626–634. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22040

Table 1.

Effects of NaHS Treatment on Liver IL-6, IL-10, cGMP, NO, H2S Levels in Rats With CP-Induced Hepatotoxicity

Control CP NaHS25 NaHS50 NaHS100
IL-6
pg mg−1 total protein
299.40 ± 27.69 485.58 ± 18.91 *** 395.84 ± 10.46 x ** 301.70 ± 15.57 xxx&& 431.22 ± 10.27 +++ ***
IL-10
pg mg−1 total protein
182.60 ± 20.39 401.68 ± 26.99 323.45 ± 14.98 x *** 240.06 ± 13.94 & xxx 372.45 ± 13.32 +++ ***
cGMP
pmol. mg−1 total protein
84.89 ± 4.34 41.59 ± 4.13 *** 51.23 ± 4.07 *** 62.29 ± 3.25 xx ** 48.24 ± 3.19 ++ ***
NO
µmol mg−1 total protein
0.049 ± 0.005 0.016 ± 0.002 0.029 ± 0.002 x *** 0.039 ± 0.002 xxx 0.022 ± 0.001 ++ ***
H 2 S
µmol g−o total protein
1.30 ± 0.18 0.93 ± 0.28 1.10 ± 0.06 ## 1.26 ± 0.13 # 2.06 ± 0.22 xx *

Data are given as mean ± SEM. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 vs. control group, x P ˂˂.05, xx P < .01, xxx P < .001 vs. CP group, & P < .05, && P < .01, &&& P < .001 vs. NaHS25 group, + P < .05, ++ P < .01, +++ P < .001 vs. NaHS50 group, # P < .05, ## P < .01, ### P < .001 vs. NaHS100 group. ANOVA (n = 8). ANOVA, analysis of variance; C; Control CP; Cyclophosphamide, NaHS; Sodium hydrosulfide; SEM, standard error of mean.