Table 1.
Study | Country of study | Surgeons, n | COI | Study type | LOE | Quality (Minors) | TKA, n | F vs M | Age, years | BMI | CR vs PR | Femoral reference | F/U, years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beldman et al. (33) | the Netherlands | 5 | No | PC | II | 14 | 193 | 128 vs 65 | 71 | 29.9 | 0 vs 193 | Anterior | 1 |
Kemp et al. (34) | UK | NR | Yes | PC | II | 14 | 107 | 55 vs 45 | 68.9 | 30.8 | 96 vs 11 | Posterior | 1 |
Matz et al. (35) | Canada | 6 | Yes | RC | III | 12 | 970 | 607 vs 363 | 76 | 33 | 0 vs 970 | Both | 2 |
Pierson et al. (18) | USA | 6 | Yes | RC | III | 15 | 830 | 348 vs 208 | 68.9 | NR | 715 vs 115 | NR | 4.4 |
White et al. (7) | USA | 1 | Yes | PC | II | 14 | 90 | 64 vs 26 | 70.3 | 29.1 | 0 vs 90 | Posterior | 2 |
Daluga et al. (26) | USA | NR | NR | RC | III | 21 | 135 | 67 vs 21 | 67.3 | NR | 0 vs 135 | NR | 2.9 |
BMI, body mass index; COI, conflict of interest; CR, cruciate retaining; F vs m, female vs male; F/U, follow-up; LOE, level of evidence; PC, prospective cohort; PS, posterior stabilized; RC, retrospective cohort.
SS, subscale.