Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 22;17(5):1371–1385. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01192-1

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of the study participants overall and by intervention group

Exercise (n = 32) Control (n = 28)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Age, years 52.6 (8.8) 52.0 (9.4)
Marital status (married/single/divorced/widow, n (%) 26 (81.3)/1 (3.1)/4 (12.5)/1 (3.1) 18 (64.3)/5 (17.9)/5 (17.9)/0 (0)
Educational level (no studies/primary/secondary/university, %) 0 (0)/4 (12.5)/9 (28.1)/19 (59.4) 1 (3.6)/2 (7.1)/7 (25.0)/19 (64.3)
Occupational status (working/housewife/not working, %) 20 (62.5)/4 (12.5)/8 (25.0) 21 (65.0)/1 (3.6)/6 (21.3)
BMI (kg/m2) 27.4 (4.2) 26.3 (5.3)
SBP (mm/Hg) 114.8 (16.1) 118.9 (16.4)
DBP (mm/Hg) 69.6 (9.7) 73.0 (11.5)
Current smoking, n (%) 3 (9.4) 3 (10.7)
Menopause, n (%) 20 (62.5) 19 (67.9)
Time since core treatments ended, years* 3.5 (1–6.75) 4.5 (2–7)
Tumor type, HR + HER2-/HR + HER2 + /HR-HER2 + /HR-HER2- (%) 59.4/18.8/6.3/15.6 71.4/17.9/0.0/10.7
Surgical procedure, n (%): tumorectomy/mastectomy 22 (69)/10 (31) 19 (68)/9 (32)
Lymph node resection, n (%) 15 (46.9) 10 (35.7)
Endocrine therapy, n (%) 27 (84.4) 25 (89.3)
Diagnosed lymphedema, n (%) 1 (3%) 5 (18%)
Peak isometric muscular strength
  IMTP (N) 575.3 (255.3) 670.1 (350.9)
  Bilateral seated bench press (N) 197.4 (56.2) 185.6 (55.5)
  Bilateral seated row (N) 211.6 (56.7) 215.8 (64.2)
  Right leg unilateral knee extension in closed kinetic chain at 90° (N) 587.7 (359.9) 576.3 (258.7)
  Left leg unilateral knee extension in closed kinetic chain at 90° (N) 670.8 (445.2) 668.9 (293.1)
  Right arm unilateral seated bench press (N) 107.6 (22.7) 105.9 (28.0)
  Left arm unilateral seated bench press (N) 101.4 (25.1) 98.5 (29.0)
  Right arm unilateral seated row (N) 138.2 (31.6) 139.5 (34.9)
  Left arm unilateral seated row (N) 134.8 (38.4) 130.6 (38.2)
Handgrip strength affected arm (kg) 25.2 (6.4) 25.4 (5.8)
Handgrip strength nonaffected arm (kg) 26.6 (5.7) 26.5 (5.4)
Estimated VO2max (mL/kg/min) 20.5 (4.7) 21.9 (4.8)
Shoulder flexion (affected arm) (°) 162.0 (19.6) 165.6 (17.7)
Shoulder flexion (nonaffected arm) (°) 172.8 (11.0) 174.3 (9.4)
Cancer-related fatigue (FACT-F total score, 0–52) 40.3 (7.2) 36.4 (10.2)
Depressive symptoms (CES-D total score, 0–60) 15.2 (10.6) 15.5 (11.0)
HRQoL, FACT-B (physical well-being, 0–28) 23.3 (3.8) 22.1 (4.5)
HRQoL, FACT-B (social well-being, 0–28) 22.1 (4.5) 19.7 (5.2)
HRQoL, FACT-B (emotional well-being, 0–28) 17.3 (4.0) 16.5 (4.8)
HRQoL, FACT-B (functional well-being, 0–28) 19.9 (3.6) 17.8 (3.9)
HRQoL, FACT-B (breast cancer subscale, 0–40) 24.3 (4.7) 23.8 (5.2)
HRQoL, FACT-B (total score, 0–148) 107.0 (14.9) 99.9 (17.9)
Satisfaction with Life Scale (total score, 0–25) 18.7 (3.2) 17.8 (4.0)

SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, WHR waist-to-height ratio, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR hormone receptor, HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IMTP isometric mid-thigh pull, N newtons, FACT-F Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, HRQoL Health-related quality of life, FACT-B Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast

*Median and interquartile range