Table 3:

Overview of studies reporting satisfaction with the prosthesis data.

Authors	Evaluation tools	Study protocol	Characteristics of patients	Aim of study	Results	Critical Review Form-TOTAL items
Bonnet et al.(2015)31	Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 questionnaire	Crossover study	12 dysvascular TTA, mean age 77 years	Evaluating the benefit of a NGF versus SACH foot for low-activity TTA	Higher satisfaction level using NGF compared to SACH. The increase is significant for the global score of the questionnaire.	14/15
Delussu et al. (2016)32	SATPRO	Observational study	20 TTA, mean age 66.6±6.7 years. 19 amputees had a K-level of 2 and 1 had a K-level of 1	Assessing amputees satisfaction with prosthesis using two different prosthetic feet: 1M10 Adjust and SACH in low-mobility TTA	Participants showed a significantly higher improvement in SAT-PRO with “1M10 Adjust” than with SACH.	12/13

Abbreviations: TTA: Trans-Tibial Amputee, SAT-PRO: Satisfaction with Prosthesis, SACH: Solid Ankle Cushion Heel, NGF: New Geriatric Foot.