Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Learn Motiv. 2023 Jun 1;83:101892. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101892

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Contextual and cue-induced freezing following direct and joint conditioning. Freezing (A,B) 15 min and (C,D) 24 h post-conditioning for direct and jointly conditioned mice, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± std. error. Genotypes are arranged on the abscissa using the rank-order of means for the cued component of freezing. N=13–20 and 15–24 mice per genotype (balanced across sex) for the direct and joint groups, respectively. + = B6 > all other strains, P<0.0001; ƒ = BTBR > ND4/DBA2/FVB/BALB, P<0.0001; # = ND4>DBA2/FVB/BALB, P<0.001; ¶ DBA2>FVB/BALB, P=0.0002; Δ= BALB < all other strains, P<0.0001 ‡ = BALB > DBA2/FVB, P<0.0001; ∞ = DBA2>ND4, P=0.0004 * = Cued > Context, P<0.05; ** = Context > Cued, P<0.05