Table 2.

Correlation of clinical metrics with change in CT derived morphometrics

Correlation matrix	∆FVC	∆DLCO	∆WCC	∆CRP	∆Albumin	∆Creatinine	∆Urea	∆CK	∆ALT
∆Pectoralis CSA in cm2	0.560*	0.962*	0.254*	0.335*	0.581*	0.560*	0.360*	0.301*	0.411*
∆Pectoralis HU ND	0.787	0.01 (R = − 0.49)	0.626*	0.205*	0.102	0.901*	0.958	0.957*	0.867*
∆Erector spinae CSA in cm2 ND	0.532	0.656	0.543*	0.257*	0.003 (R = 0.562)	0.267*	0.184	0.304*	0.342*
∆Erector spinae HU	0.921*	0.673*	0.121*	0.417*	0.478*	0.724*	0.299*	0.529*	0.571*
∆Subcutaneous CSA T12 in cm2	0.437*	0.432*	0.645*	0.171*	0.995*	0.911*	0.858*	0.954*	0.896*
∆Visceral CSA T12 in cm2	0.899*	0.757*	0.308*	0.269*	0.348*	*0.939*	0.527*	0.697*	0.417*
∆Visceral CSA LMCO in cm2	0.255	0.335	0.166*	0.896*	0.293	0.718*	0.630	0.868*	0.810*

This table represents the change in the specified variable between T0 and T1. Pearson correlation was carried out when assessing the delta of two variables with normal distribution. Otherwise, the Spearman coefficient was used. Use of Spearmans test was indicated by a *. Values indicated are p-values and where a p-value < 0.05 and corresponding R-value