Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;12(5):1491–1515. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00518-0

Table 1.

Summary of studies in the ofatumumab clinical program in MS

Clinical study Clinical phase Mode of administration; ofatumumab dosing; treatment duration Number of participants Primary outcome measure Other outcome measures Results
IV infusion study [39] Phase 2 IV; 2 infusions, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 700 mg 2 weeks apart or placebo (at Week 24, patients crossed over to opposite treatment arm); 48 weeks 38 Cumulative number of new Gd + lesions, new and/or enlarging T2 lesions, and T1 hypointense lesions measured on monthly MRI Proportion of relapse-free patients; relapse rate and change in EDSS and MSFC scores from baseline to Week 24 and from Week 24 to Week 48; safety (AE assessments, MRI, and clinical laboratory tests)

New brain MRI lesion activity was suppressed by > 99% in the first 24 weeks after ofatumumab administration across all doses, with statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) favoring ofatumumab vs. placebo found in the number of new T1 Gd + lesions, total T1 Gd + lesions, and new and/or enlarging T2 lesions

Ofatumumab did not provide significant benefit regarding T1 hypointense lesions

Ofatumumab was associated with profound and selective reduction of B cells at each dose as measured by CD19 + expression

No unexpected safety signals were identified for ofatumumab in the context of other indications, including rheumatoid arthritis

MIRROR [40] Phase 2b SC; 3, 30, or 60 mg q12w or 60 mg q4w or placebo; 24 weeks 232 Cumulative number of new Gd + lesions (per brain MRI) at Week 12 Cumulative number of new Gd + lesions at Week 24; cumulative number and total volume of new and new plus persisting Gd + lesions; new and/or newly enlarging T2 lesions; T1-hypointense lesions at Weeks 12 and 24; safety

The cumulative number of new lesions was reduced by 65% for all ofatumumab doses vs placebo (p < 0.001)

Post-hoc analysis (excluding the Week 4 scan, consistent with the phase 2 approaches with other anti-CD20 products) revealed a clear dose–response and estimated a ≥ 90% lesion reduction vs. placebo (Week 12) for all cumulative ofatumumab doses ≥ 30 mg/12 weeks

Dose-dependent CD19 B-cell depletion was observed

SC ofatumumab demonstrated overall good tolerability and no new/unexpected safety findings

No serious IRRs: IRRs were only seen at doses ≤ 30 mg/12 weeks

ASCLEPIOS I and II [16, 41] Phase 3 SC; 20 mg q4w after 20-mg loading doses at Days 1, 7, and 14 or teriflunomide; 30 months 1882 ARR 3- or 6-month CDW; 6-month CDI; number of Gd + lesions per T1-weighted MRI scan; annualized rate of new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted MRI scan; serum NfL chain levels at Month 3; change in brain volume; safety

ARRs in the ofatumumab and teriflunomide groups were 0.1 and 0.2, respectively, in Trial 1 (difference, − 0.1; 95% CI, − 0.2 to − 0.1; p < 0.001) and 0.1 and 0.3 in Trial 2 (difference, − 0.2; 95% CI, − 0.2 to − 0.1; p < 0.001)

10.9% and 15.0% of patients on ofatumumab and teriflunomide, respectively, experienced 3-month CDW (HR, 0.7; p = 0.002)

8.1% and 12.0% of patients experienced 6-month CDW (HR, 0.7; p = 0.01)

11.0% and 8.1% of patients experienced 6-month CDI (HR, 1.4; p = 0.09)

The mean number of Gd + lesions per T1-weighted MRI scan (1 lesion per 50 scans) was reduced by 97% and 94% with ofatumumab vs. teriflunomide (p < 0.001) in trial 1 and trial 2, respectively

The annualized rate of lesions on T2-weighted MRI and serum NfL chain levels were reduced with ofatumumab vs. teriflunomide

AEs that occurred in at least 10% of patients on ofatumumab were IRRs, nasopharyngitis, headache, injection-site reaction, upper respiratory tract infection, and urinary tract infection – AEs and AE rates were similar with ofatumumab and teriflunomide treatment; SAEs were reported in 9.1% of patients on ofatumumab and 7.9% of patients on teriflunomide

In the ofatumumab group, two cases of basal-cell carcinoma, one case of malignant melanoma in situ, one case of recurrent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and one case of invasive breast carcinoma were reported

There was also one case of myocardial infarction in the ofatumumab group

In the teriflunomide group, two cases of basal-cell carcinoma, one case of cervix carcinoma and one case of fibrosarcoma were reported

Analysis of efficacy and safety of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in the subgroup of RDTN patients (n = 615) from ASCLEPIOS I/II found ofatumumab to be an appropriate treatment option also in early patients

APLIOS (17) Phase 2 SC; 20 mg q4w after 20-mg loading doses at Days 1, 7, and 14; 12 weeks 256 Area under the plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval and Cmax after drug administration Plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval and Cmax; proportion of patients with anti-ofatumumab Abs; MRI lesion activity; safety (AEs, including injection-related systemic reactions and laboratory abnormalities)

Abdominal ofatumumab PK exposure was bioequivalent for autoinjector and PFS [geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval, 487.7 vs. 474.1 h × μg/mL (ratio 1.0); Cmax, 1.4 vs. 1.4 μg/mL (ratio 1.0)]

B-cell counts (median cells/μL) depleted rapidly in all groups from 214.0 (baseline) to 2.0 (Day 14)

The mean number of new/persisting Gd + T1 lesions decreased from 1.5 at baseline to 0.8, 0.3, and 0.1 by Weeks 4, 8, and 12, respectively; the proportion of patients free of Gd + T1 lesions increased over time in all ofatumumab groups

Ofatumumab had favorable safety and tolerability profiles, in line with those reported in the ASCLEPIOS I/II trials

APOLITOS [42] Phase 2 SC; 20 mg q4w after 20-mg loading doses at Days 1, 7, and 14 or placebo; total duration 48 weeks (placebo-controlled initial 24 weeks) 64 Number of Gd + T1 lesions per scan over 24 weeks Consistency of efficacy of ofatumumab on the cumulative number of Gd + T1 lesions on MRI scans at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 across regions (Japan and Russia); the efficacy of ofatumumab vs. placebo on the annualized rate of new or enlarging T2 lesions; ARR; time to first relapse; safety

Ofatumumab reduced Gd + T1 lesions vs. placebo by 93.6% (p < 0.001); results were consistent across regions

Ofatumumab reduced annualized T2 lesion and relapse rate vs. placebo by Week 24

Both groups showed a benefit from ofatumumab in the APOLITOS extension-part (up to 48 weeks)

Incidence of AEs was lower with ofatumumab vs. placebo (69.8% vs. 81.0%); IRRs were most common

No deaths, opportunistic infections, or malignancies

ALITHIOS [43, 44] Ongoing open-label extension of ASCLEPIOS I/II, APLIOS, APOLITOS SC; 20 mg q4w for up to 5 years 1367 Number of patients that experience an AE or abnormal laboratory, vital and/or ECG results and positive suicidality outcomes ARRs; confirmed 3- and 6- month disability worsening; confirmed 6-, 12- and 24-month disability improvement and improvement until end of study; safety

86.2% (n = 1698) of patients experienced at least one AE in the ASCLEPIOS I/II + extension studies

Overall rate of AEs and SAEs remained consistent with the rates observed during ASCLEPIOS I/II

No new safety signals, compared to those reported in the ASCLEPIOS I and II trials, were identified

In the between-group analysis, there was a 43.4% reduction in the number of confirmed relapses and near complete suppression of MRI lesions in the continuous ofatumumab group vs. the teriflunomide-ofatumumab switch group

Ab antibody, AE adverse event, ARR annualized relapse rate, CDI confirmed disability improvement, CDW confirmed disability worsening, CI confidence interval, Cmax maximum plasma concentration, ECG electrocardiogram, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, Gd+ gadolinium-enhancing, HR hazard ratio, IRR injection-related reaction, IV intravenous, MRI magnetic resonance ratio, MSFC Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, NfL neurofilament light, PFS pre-filled syringe, PK pharmacokinetic, q4w every 4 weeks, q12w every 12 weeks, RDTN recently diagnosed and treatment-naïve, SAE serious adverse event, SC subcutaneous