Table 3.

Estimated coefficients of the moderated mediation model.

	Model 4		Model 5
	Perceived insider status		Job performance
	OLS	Heckman	OLS	Heckman
Main
Gender	0.05	0.02	−0.09	−0.04
	(0.38)	(0.12)	(−0.82)	(−0.33)
Age	0.06	0.06	0.05*	0.05*
	(1.92)	(1.95)	(2.26)	(1.98)
Education	0.06*	0.07*	0.02	0.02
	(2.42)	(2.54)	(1.19)	(0.68)
Tenure	0.03	0.03	0.01	0.01
	(1.17)	(1.25)	(0.45)	(0.25)
Employment form	0.97***	0.97***	0.20**	0.20**
	(13.83)	(13.87)	(3.04)	(3.08)
Workers’ job value status	−1.17***	−1.17***	−0.24**	−0.25**
	(−13.88)	(−13.96)	(−3.11)	(−3.18)
Employment forms × Workers’ job value status	1.30***		0.26**
	(12.47)		(2.79)
1. Employment forms × Workers’ job value status		1.05***		0.63**
		(3.58)		(3.28)
Perceived insider status			0.56***	0.56***
			(15.08)	(15.22)
_cons	2.76***	2.84***	1.54***	1.44***
	(13.67)	(12.85)	(8.30)	(7.23)
Employment forms × Workers’ job value status
Gender		−0.36		−0.38
		(−1.04)		(−1.08)
Age		0.02		0.03
		(0.28)		(0.32)
Education		0.08		0.08
		(1.17)		(1.12)
Tenure		0.04		0.04
		(0.49)		(0.52)
_cons		−0.62		−0.62
		(−1.28)		(−1.26)
/
athrho		0.30		−0.58*
		−0.91		(−2.14)
lnsigma		−0.67***		−0.88***
		(−10.58)		(−11.54)
N	426	426	426	426
Adj. R-sq	0.73		0.76
pseudo R ~ q

N = 426 employees. SE, standard error. For employment form, 1 = standard, 0 = outsourced. For workers’ job value status, 1 = core-status, 0 = peripheral-status. t statistics in parentheses.*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.