Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 24;1:7. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13073.1

Table 2. Maximum intensity and energy distribution analysis of the different parts of the resulting beam profiles from truncated Gaussian beams (circular aperture) shown in Figure 1 (a) and Figure 2.

Ring function Peak intensity (a.u.) % Energy distribution
Central
region
First
ring
Second
ring
Central
region
First
ring
Second
ring
Rest
Airy ( β G ≈ 0) 1 1.8·10 -2 4.2·10 -3 83.8 % 7.2 % 2.8 % 6.2 %
P T =25% ( β G =0.38) 1 1.5·10 -2 3.6·10 -3 86.4 % 6.2 % 2.4 % 5.0 %
P T =40% ( β G =0.51) 1 1.3·10 -2 3.2·10 -3 87.9 % 5.5 % 2.1 % 4.5 %
P T =60% ( β G =0.68) 1 1.1·10 -2 2.6·10 -3 90.5 % 4.2 % 1.7 % 3.6 %
P T =75% ( β G =0.83) 1 7.7·10 -3 1.9·10 -3 93.0 % 3.0 % 1.2 % 2.8 %
P T =90% ( β G =1.07) 1 3.7·10 -3 1.1·10 -3 96.5 % 1.3 % 0.7 % 1.5 %