Table 3.

The results of the generalized linear models testing effect of habitat type and absolute difference in imperious surface area (ISA_d) on taxonomical, functional, and phylogenetic beta diversity. The effect size is represented by Cohen’s f

Response	Effect size	F	df	p
Taxonomic nestedness
Habitat type	0.35	45.50	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.13	11.92	1, 744	0.001
Habitat type × ISAd	0.21	16.25	2, 744	< 0.0001
Taxonomic — turnover
Habitat type	0.18	11.82	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.29	61.00	1, 744	< 0.0001
Habitat type × ISAd	0.30	34.46	2, 744	< 0.0001
Taxonomic — overall
Habitat type	0.14	7.05	2, 744	0.001
ISAd	0.28	60.21	1, 744	< 0.0001
Habitat type × ISAd	0.26	24.46	2, 744	< 0.0001
Functional — nestedness
Habitat type	0.34	43.35	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.09	5.61	1, 744	0.018
Habitat type × ISAd	0.16	9.94	2, 744	0.0001
Functional — turnover
Habitat type	0.22	18.22	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.05	1.53	1, 744	0.216
Habitat type × ISAd	0.12	5.68	2, 744	0.003
Functional — overall
Habitat type	0.18	11.42	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.18	25.13	1, 744	< 0.0001
Habitat type × ISAd	0.07	1.77	2, 744	0.1707
Phylogenetic — nestedness
Habitat type	0.34	43.86	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.03	0.62	1, 744	0.429
Habitat type × ISAd	0.15	8.70	2, 744	< 0.0001
Phylogenetic — turnover
Habitat type	0.34	42.17	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.20	28.16	1, 744	< 0.0001
Habitat type × ISAd	0.34	43.98	2, 744	< 0.0001
Phylogenetic — overall
Habitat type	0.18	11.97	2, 744	< 0.0001
ISAd	0.19	25.98	1, 744	< 0.0001
Habitat type × ISAd	0.24	20.72	2, 744	< 0.0001