| Individual patient characteristics |
Sociocultural factors may impact response to multiple components of the testing process
Prior experience of the test or testing process may influence knowledge and expectations of the test’s purpose and acceptance of related risks
Prior probability of the condition being tested for, whether actual or perceived by the patient
|
| Test type (ie, screening, diagnostic, monitoring) |
Screening tests can lead to false positive results given large numbers of asymptomatic people being tested with relatively low prior probability
Monitoring or surveillance for known condition (eg, cancer recurrence) can lead to anxiety in test intervals, and/or reassurance if results are negative
|
| Clinical situation |
Nature of the clinical condition being evaluated and its potential significance for that person’s healthcare may affect the balance of PCOs
Testing in high acuity (eg, emergency department) settings may present different balance of benefits and risks (and prior probability of a given condition) compared with lower acuity (eg, primary care) setting
|
| Clinicians and healthcare team |
Perception of size and importance of test benefits and risks, based on experience, relationship with patient, healthcare setting, and knowledge or perception of an individual patient’s prior probability
Ability (including time) to communicate indication for test is being used, relative risks and benefits
Medical culture(s) may impose norms around test utilisation, acceptable levels of risk, patient expectations
|
| Physical environment of imaging suite |
Location in the clinic/hospital, visual appearance can influence patient emotions around the testing process
Radiology staff can modify outcomes such as emotions and physical experiences through communication, trust and empathy
|
| Communication of test results |
|