TABLE 3.
Protein | Mol wt (kDa) | No. of copies of proteina
|
No. of copies of cysteine and methionine
|
Relative proportion of cysteine and methionineb
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Virus | Core | Moleculec | Viriond | Core | Virion | Core | ||
λ1 | 137.4 | 120 | 120 | 55 | 6,600 | 6,600 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
λ2 | 144.0 | 60 | 60 | 43 | 2,580 | 2,580 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
λ3 | 142.4 | 12 | 12 | 65 | 780 | 780 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
μ1c | 76.3 | 600 | 20 | 12,000 | 1.8 | |||
μ2 | 83.3 | 21e | 14 | 39 | 819 | 546 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
ς1 | 51.4 | 36 | 9 | 324 | 0.1 | |||
ς2 | 47.1 | 120e | 120 | 18 | 2,160 | 2,160 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
ς3 | 41.2 | 600 | 27 | 16,200 | 2.5 |
Dryden et al. (28).
The relative proportion of cysteine and methionine in each structure is normalized to the total copy number of cysteine (C) and methionine (M) in the λ1 protein by the following formula: [(copies of C and M for the protein) × (copies of the protein)] ÷ [(copies of C and M in λ1) × (copies of λ1)].
From published sequence data as follows: λ1 (7), λ2 (84), λ3 (99), μ1 (49, 98), μ1c (69), μ2 (97), ς1 (8), ς2 (25, 100), and ς3 (37).
The total cysteine and methionine in the structure for each protein was calculated by using the following formula: (total C and M in the protein) × (copies of protein).
The copy numbers of μ2 are from reference 20.