Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2023 Feb 23;47(1):13–20. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000372

Table 1:

Comparison of baseline participant characteristics across levels of aberrant movement summary scores.

Entire Sample (n=194)
(mean ± SD or %)
Aberrant movement Score of 0 (n=72)
(mean ± SD or %)
Aberrant movement Score of 1 (n=74)
(mean ± SD or %)
Aberrant movement Score of 2 (n=42)
(mean ± SD or %)
Aberrant movement Score of 3 (n=6)
(mean ± SD or %)

Main effect P - value

Post-hoc
P - value
Age (years) 69.6±6.5 68.2±5.8 70.6±6.8 70.1±7.2 69.2±5.0 0.164 -
Sex (female) 49% 50% 51.3% 42.9% 50% 0.843 -
BMI (kg/cm2) 29.4±5.6 29.3±5.6 29.2±5.8 30.2±5.4 28.0±3.8 0.739 -
Composite LBP intensity (0–10) 2.9±1.3 2.8±1.2 2.7±1.2 3.2±1.3 4.0±2.3 0.039* -
Number of prior falls 1.0±2.6 1.2±2.4 0.7±1.7 1.0±3.9 1.3±2.4 0.738 -
Number of anxiolytics 0.1±0.3 0.03±0.2 0.1±0.3 0.1±0.4 0.0±0.0 0.171 -
Number of hip OA signs and symptoms 3.0±1.3 2.9±1.2 3.1±1.2 3.1±1.6 3.5±2.1 0.704 -
FSST (seconds) 10.2±2.7 9.6±2.3 10.1±2.4 11.2±3.3 11.9±3.5 0.006* 0.009*a
Number of prospective falls 1.0±1.8 0.7±1.2 1.2±2.3 0.9±1.4 2.7±2.6 0.027* 0.042*b

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; FSST = Four-Square Step Test; LBP = low back pain; OA = osteoarthritis; SD = standard deviation.

= violated Levene’s test based on median;

*

= p<0.05;

= post-hoc p-values of significant differences;

*a

= significant difference between aberrant movement summary scores of 2 and 0;

*b

= significant difference between aberrant movement summary scores of 3 and 0