Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Feb 24;28(3):793–813. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12654

TABLE 4.

Logistic regressions of link follows by condition with control and values contrasts.

Predictor β SE β Wald’s X2 df p eβ (odds ratio)

Control vs. all affirmation conditions
 Constant −3.75 .72 27.47 1 <.001
 Values affirmation 1.21 .83 2.12 1 .145 3.36

Social affirmation 1.89 .78 5.88 1 .015 6.62
 Perspective circle 2.20 .77 8.13 1 .004 8.98
 Imp. Intention 1.28 .82 2.44 1 .118 3.58

Values vs. other self-affirmation conditions
 Constant −2.54 .42 35.85 1 <.001
 Social affirmation .68 .53 1.68 1 .196 1.97
 Perspective circle .98 .51 3.72 1 .054 2.68
 Imp. intention .07 .58 .01 1 .909 .08
Test X 2 df p Nagelkerke R2
Control vs. all affirmation conditions
 Overall model evaluation
  Likelihood ratio test 14.80 4 .005 .071
  Score test 13.72 4 .008

Values vs. other self-affirmation conditions
 Overall model evaluation
  Likelihood ratio test 5.91 3 .116 .033
  Score test 5.95 3 .114

Note: Significant condition effects are bolded.